share_log

Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Focuslight Technologies Inc's (SHSE:688167) Market Cap Dropped by CN¥412m

Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Focuslight Technologies Inc's (SHSE:688167) Market Cap Dropped by CN¥412m

隨着弗克斯耀科技公司(SHSE:688167)的市值下降了412億人民幣,持有重要股份的零售投資者以及機構可能感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 20:16

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Focuslight Technologies indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
  • 21% of Focuslight Technologies is held by insiders
  • 散戶投資者對炬光科技的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面共同擁有更大的發言權
  • 50% 的業務由前 18 名股東持有
  • 炬光科技 21% 的股份由內部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of Focuslight Technologies Inc (SHSE:688167) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看炬光科技公司(上海證券交易所代碼:688167)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是散戶投資者,準確地說約爲45%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 10.0% price drop, institutions with their 24% holdings also suffered.

儘管在上週股價下跌10.0%之後,散戶投資者的持股量受到打擊,但持有24%的機構也遭受了損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Focuslight Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究炬光科技的每種類型的所有者。

big
SHSE:688167 Ownership Breakdown September 7th 2024
SHSE: 688167 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 7 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Focuslight Technologies?

關於炬光科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Focuslight Technologies. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Focuslight Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者持有炬光科技的相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下炬光科技過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SHSE:688167 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 7th 2024
SHSE: 688167 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 7 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Focuslight Technologies. With a 14% stake, CEO Xingsheng Liu is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.7% and 4.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在炬光科技的股份不多。首席執行官劉興生持有14%的股份,是最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.7%和4.2%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前18位的合計持有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Focuslight Technologies

炬光科技的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Focuslight Technologies Inc. Insiders own CN¥792m worth of shares in the CN¥3.7b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有炬光科技公司合理比例的股份。內部人士擁有這家37元人民幣公司價值79200萬元人民幣的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 45% stake in Focuslight Technologies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有炬光科技45%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 9.4%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的9.4%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Focuslight Technologies you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了三種你應該注意的炬光科技警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論