Is Kingboard Holdings (HKG:148) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Kingboard Holdings (HKG:148) Using Too Much Debt?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Kingboard Holdings Limited (HKG:148) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
有些人說,作爲投資者,比起債務,波動性才是最好的風險思考方式,但是禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過'波動性遠非風險的同義詞'。因此,看起來聰明的投資者知道,債務(通常涉及破產)是評估公司風險的非常重要的因素。值得注意的是,金寶集團(HKG:148)確實存在債務。但是,這個債務對股東來說是一個擔憂嗎?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務支持企業,直到企業出現困難無法償還,無論是通過新的資本還是通過自由現金流。在最壞的情況下,如果一個公司無法償還其債權人,它可能會破產。但是,更爲常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,一個公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東,以便控制債務。然而,通過取代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本投資高回報擴張的企業的極好工具。當我們審查債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。
How Much Debt Does Kingboard Holdings Carry?
金寶集團承載了多少債務?
As you can see below, Kingboard Holdings had HK$23.2b of debt, at June 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had HK$11.3b in cash, and so its net debt is HK$11.9b.
正如您可以在下面看到的,金寶集團在2024年6月份有232億港元的債務,與前一年大致相同。您可以點擊圖表以查看更詳細的信息。然而,它也有113億港元的現金,因此其淨債務爲119億港元。
A Look At Kingboard Holdings' Liabilities
關於金伯利控股的負債情況
According to the last reported balance sheet, Kingboard Holdings had liabilities of HK$19.8b due within 12 months, and liabilities of HK$15.0b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of HK$11.3b as well as receivables valued at HK$12.7b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by HK$10.8b.
根據上次披露的資產負債表,金伯利控股的短期負債爲198億港元,長期負債爲150億港元。 抵消這些義務,其現金爲113億港元,應收賬款爲127億港元,均在12個月內到期。 因此,其負債超過了現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和108億港元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of HK$17.1b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Kingboard Holdings' use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相對於其市值171億港元,這個赤字相當可觀,因此確實提示股東們應該密切關注金伯利控股對債務的利用情況。 這表明如果公司需要迅速健全其資產負債表,股東們將面臨嚴重稀釋。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。
Kingboard Holdings's net debt is sitting at a very reasonable 1.8 times its EBITDA, while its EBIT covered its interest expense just 4.7 times last year. While that doesn't worry us too much, it does suggest the interest payments are somewhat of a burden. We saw Kingboard Holdings grow its EBIT by 2.5% in the last twelve months. Whilst that hardly knocks our socks off it is a positive when it comes to debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Kingboard Holdings can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
金伯利控股的淨債務相對其EBITDA非常合理,爲1.8倍,而其EBIt去年僅覆蓋了利息支出的4.7倍。 雖然這並不讓我們過分擔憂,但確實表明利息支付在一定程度上是個負擔。 我們看到金伯利控股在過去12個月內將其EBIt增長了2.5%,雖然這並沒有讓我們感到特別驚喜,但在處理債務方面確實是一個積極的信號。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是開始的明顯位置。 但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定金伯利控股是否能夠長期改善其資產負債表。 因此,如果您想知道專業人士的看法,您可能會發現分析師利潤預測的免費報告有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Kingboard Holdings's free cash flow amounted to 43% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,公司只能用實實在在的現金償還債務,而不是會計利潤。 因此,我們始終檢查EBIt中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。 在過去三年中,金伯利控股的自由現金流佔其EBIt的比例達到43%,低於我們的預期。 這種較弱的現金轉化使處理負債更加困難。
Our View
我們的觀點
Both Kingboard Holdings's level of total liabilities and its interest cover were discouraging. At least its net debt to EBITDA gives us reason to be optimistic. We think that Kingboard Holdings's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Kingboard Holdings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored...
金浦鈺的總負債水平和利息覆蓋率令人沮喪。 至少其淨債務與息稅攤銷前利潤比給我們帶來了樂觀情緒。 我們認爲考慮到上述數據點,金浦鈺的債務使其有些風險。 並不是所有的風險都是不好的,因爲它有可能提高股價回報,但這種債務風險值得記在心裏。 資產負債表是分析債務時要重點關注的領域。 然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表之內——遠非如此。 請注意,金浦鈺在我們的投資分析中顯示出了2個警示信號,其中一個信號是不能被忽視的...
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。