With 5.2% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Otter Tail Corporation's (NASDAQ:OTTR) 8.3% Stock Price Decline
With 5.2% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Otter Tail Corporation's (NASDAQ:OTTR) 8.3% Stock Price Decline
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Otter Tail's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 高機構所有權意味着 Otter Tail 的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
- 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解
A look at the shareholders of Otter Tail Corporation (NASDAQ:OTTR) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 59% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看Otter Tail Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:OTTR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。機構擁有59%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 8.3% in value last week. However, the 5.2% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降8.3%的機構投資者。但是,5.2%的股東一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Otter Tail.
在下圖中,我們放大了 Otter Tail 的不同所有權組。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Otter Tail?
機構所有權告訴我們關於 Otter Tail 的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Otter Tail does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Otter Tail's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,Otter Tail確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Otter Tail的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Otter Tail is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 8.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Charles MacFarlane is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。Otter Tail 不歸對沖基金所有。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的16%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的12%和8.3%。此外,首席執行官查爾斯·麥克法蘭持有該公司0.7%的股份。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前十名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。
Insider Ownership Of Otter Tail
Otter Tail 的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Otter Tail Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$69m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有Otter Tail Corporation的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值6900萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Otter Tail. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有30%所有權的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Otter Tail有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With an ownership of 8.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司擁有8.3%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Otter Tail (including 1 which is potentially serious) .
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該了解我們在 Otter Tail 中發現的 2 個警告信號(包括 1 個可能很嚴重的警告)。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。