share_log

Institutional Investors in Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV) See US$1.5b Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV) See US$1.5b Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

紐交所上的都福集團(NYSE:DOV)的機構投資者上週市值減少了15億美元,儘管長期收益對他們有利。
Simply Wall St ·  09/09 08:20

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Dover's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,多佛的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 共有15名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

If you want to know who really controls Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 87% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着多佛公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:DOV),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲87%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 5.7% in value last week. However, the 27% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降5.7%的機構投資者。但是,27%的股東一年回報率可能減輕了打擊。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Dover, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Dover的每種所有者。

big
NYSE:DOV Ownership Breakdown September 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:DOV 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dover?

關於多佛,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Dover does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Dover's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,多佛確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到多佛的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

big
NYSE:DOV Earnings and Revenue Growth September 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:DOV 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 9 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Dover is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.1% and 6.8% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。多佛不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.1%和6.8%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前15位的公司合併所有權爲51%,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Dover

多佛的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Dover Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$98m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有多佛公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值9800萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是在買入還是賣出可能會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Dover. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有多佛13%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Dover (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向多佛確定了4個警告信號(至少有一個警告信號,這很重要),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論