Companies Like IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) Are In A Position To Invest In Growth
Companies Like IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) Are In A Position To Invest In Growth
There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although software-as-a-service business Salesforce.com lost money for years while it grew recurring revenue, if you held shares since 2005, you'd have done very well indeed. Having said that, unprofitable companies are risky because they could potentially burn through all their cash and become distressed.
毫無疑問,擁有無利可圖的企業的股份可以賺錢。例如,儘管軟件即服務業務Salesforce.com在增加經常性收入的同時虧損了多年,但如果你自2005年以來持有股票,你確實會做得很好。話雖如此,無利可圖的公司是有風險的,因爲它們有可能耗盡所有現金並陷入困境。
So should IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) shareholders be worried about its cash burn? For the purposes of this article, cash burn is the annual rate at which an unprofitable company spends cash to fund its growth; its negative free cash flow. First, we'll determine its cash runway by comparing its cash burn with its cash reserves.
那麼,IonQ(紐約證券交易所代碼:IONQ)的股東應該擔心其現金消耗嗎?就本文而言,現金消耗是指無利可圖的公司每年花費現金爲其增長提供資金的比率;其自由現金流爲負。首先,我們將通過將其現金消耗與現金儲備進行比較來確定其現金流道。
Does IonQ Have A Long Cash Runway?
ionQ 的現金跑道很長嗎?
You can calculate a company's cash runway by dividing the amount of cash it has by the rate at which it is spending that cash. As at June 2024, IonQ had cash of US$370m and no debt. Importantly, its cash burn was US$124m over the trailing twelve months. That means it had a cash runway of about 3.0 years as of June 2024. Arguably, that's a prudent and sensible length of runway to have. We should note, however, that if we extrapolate recent trends in its cash burn, then its cash runway would get a lot longer. Depicted below, you can see how its cash holdings have changed over time.
你可以通過將公司的現金金額除以現金的支出率來計算公司的現金流量。截至2024年6月,IonQ擁有3.7億美元的現金,沒有債務。重要的是,在過去的十二個月中,其現金消耗爲1.24億美元。這意味着截至2024年6月,它的現金流約爲3.0年。可以說,這是一條審慎而合理的跑道長度。但是,我們應該注意,如果我們推斷其現金消耗的近期趨勢,那麼其現金流將變得更長。如下所示,您可以看到其現金持有量隨着時間的推移而發生了怎樣的變化。
How Well Is IonQ Growing?
ionQ 的增長情況如何?
IonQ actually ramped up its cash burn by a whopping 86% in the last year, which shows it is boosting investment in the business. While that certainly gives us pause for thought, we take a lot of comfort in the strong annual revenue growth of 91%. Considering the factors above, the company doesn't fare badly when it comes to assessing how it is changing over time. While the past is always worth studying, it is the future that matters most of all. For that reason, it makes a lot of sense to take a look at our analyst forecasts for the company.
去年,ionQ的現金消耗量實際上增加了86%,這表明它正在增加對該業務的投資。儘管這無疑讓我們停下來思考,但我們對91%的強勁年收入增長感到非常安慰。考慮到上述因素,該公司在評估其隨時間推移的變化方面表現並不差。雖然過去總是值得研究的,但最重要的是未來。出於這個原因,看看我們的分析師對公司的預測很有意義。
How Easily Can IonQ Raise Cash?
ionQ 如何輕鬆籌集現金?
While IonQ seems to be in a decent position, we reckon it is still worth thinking about how easily it could raise more cash, if that proved desirable. Generally speaking, a listed business can raise new cash through issuing shares or taking on debt. Many companies end up issuing new shares to fund future growth. We can compare a company's cash burn to its market capitalisation to get a sense for how many new shares a company would have to issue to fund one year's operations.
儘管IonQ似乎處於不錯的境地,但我們認爲如果事實證明可取的話,它能多麼容易地籌集更多現金,還是值得考慮的。一般而言,上市企業可以通過發行股票或承擔債務來籌集新現金。許多公司最終發行新股以資助未來的增長。我們可以將公司的現金消耗與其市值進行比較,以了解公司必須發行多少新股才能爲一年的運營提供資金。
Since it has a market capitalisation of US$1.5b, IonQ's US$124m in cash burn equates to about 8.5% of its market value. Given that is a rather small percentage, it would probably be really easy for the company to fund another year's growth by issuing some new shares to investors, or even by taking out a loan.
由於其市值爲15億美元,IonQ的1.24億美元現金消耗相當於其市值的8.5%左右。鑑於這個百分比相當小,公司可能很容易通過向投資者發行一些新股甚至貸款來爲下一年的增長提供資金。
So, Should We Worry About IonQ's Cash Burn?
那麼,我們應該擔心 IonQ 的現金消耗嗎?
It may already be apparent to you that we're relatively comfortable with the way IonQ is burning through its cash. For example, we think its revenue growth suggests that the company is on a good path. Although we do find its increasing cash burn to be a bit of a negative, once we consider the other metrics mentioned in this article together, the overall picture is one we are comfortable with. After taking into account the various metrics mentioned in this report, we're pretty comfortable with how the company is spending its cash, as it seems on track to meet its needs over the medium term. On another note, IonQ has 5 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
你可能已經很明顯,我們對ionQ消耗現金的方式相對滿意。例如,我們認爲其收入增長表明公司走上了良好的道路。儘管我們確實發現其不斷增加的現金消耗略有負數,但一旦我們綜合考慮本文中提到的其他指標,總體情況就會令人滿意。在考慮了本報告中提到的各種指標之後,我們對該公司的現金支出方式感到非常滿意,因爲它似乎有望在中期內滿足其需求。另一方面,IonQ 有 5 個警告信號(其中一個讓我們有點不舒服),我們認爲你應該知道。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies, and this list of stocks growth stocks (according to analyst forecasts)
當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單以及這份成長型股票清單(根據分析師的預測)
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。