share_log

Redfin Corporation's (NASDAQ:RDFN) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 10% Over Last Week

Redfin Corporation's (NASDAQ:RDFN) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 10% Over Last Week

redfin公司(納斯達克:RDFN)的高機構持股率證明了自身的實力,股票在上週繼續上漲10%。
Simply Wall St ·  09/10 09:13

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Redfin's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 高機構所有權意味着Redfin的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有25名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲45%
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Redfin Corporation (NASDAQ:RDFN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 55% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了雷德芬公司(納斯達克股票代碼:RDFN),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲55%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.3b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 14% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,在該公司的市值達到13億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。目前,一年股東回報率爲14%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Redfin.

在下圖中,我們放大了Redfin的不同所有權組。

big
NasdaqGS:RDFN Ownership Breakdown September 10th 2024
NASDAQGS: RDFN 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Redfin?

關於Redfin,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Redfin already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Redfin's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Redfin已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Redfin的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGS:RDFN Earnings and Revenue Growth September 10th 2024
NASDAQGS: RDFN 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 10 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Redfin. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. With 7.2% and 2.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Geode Capital Management, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Glenn Kelman directly holds 1.2% of the total shares outstanding.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Redfin進行有意義的投資。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的14%。貝萊德公司和Geode Capital Management, LLC分別擁有7.2%和2.4%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司首席執行官格倫·凱爾曼直接持有已發行股份總額的1.2%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Redfin

Redfin 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Redfin Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$56m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有雷德芬公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值5600萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Redfin. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有41%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Redfin有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Redfin (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有,我們發現了 Redfin 的 4 個警告信號(其中 1 個很重要!)你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論