share_log

We Think That There Are More Issues For GemPharmatech (SHSE:688046) Than Just Sluggish Earnings

We Think That There Are More Issues For GemPharmatech (SHSE:688046) Than Just Sluggish Earnings

我們認爲GemPharmatech(SHSE:688046)存在更多問題,不僅僅是業績低迷。
Simply Wall St ·  09/10 18:05

GemPharmatech Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688046) stock showed strength, with investors undeterred by its weak earnings report. Sometimes, shareholders are willing to ignore soft numbers with the hope that they will improve, but our analysis suggests this is unlikely for GemPharmatech.

GemPharmatech股票(SHSE:688046)表現強勁,投資者對其疲弱的盈利報告並不擔心。有時,股東願意忽視不太好的數字,希望它們會改善,但我們的分析表明,這對GemPharmatech來說是不太可能的。

big
SHSE:688046 Earnings and Revenue History September 10th 2024
SHSE:688046收益和營業收入歷史記錄2024年9月10日

Zooming In On GemPharmatech's Earnings

聚焦GemPharmatech的收益

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

正如財務迷們已經知道的那樣,現金流的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與利潤匹配程度的重要指標。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先減去一段時間的FCF和利潤,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均營運資產。該比率顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的多少。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,當一個公司應記比率爲負數時,實際上這被視爲一件好事,而如果該比率爲正數則被視爲一件壞事。這並不意味着我們應該擔心正的應記比率,但值得注意的是,當應計比率相當高時,引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年的一篇論文"高應計的公司未來的盈利能力較差"。

For the year to June 2024, GemPharmatech had an accrual ratio of 0.32. We can therefore deduce that its free cash flow fell well short of covering its statutory profit, suggesting we might want to think twice before putting a lot of weight on the latter. In the last twelve months it actually had negative free cash flow, with an outflow of CN¥142m despite its profit of CN¥157.7m, mentioned above. Coming off the back of negative free cash flow last year, we imagine some shareholders might wonder if its cash burn of CN¥142m, this year, indicates high risk. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

對於2024年6月的財年,GemPharmatech的應計比率爲0.32。因此,我們可以推斷其自由現金流遠遠不足以覆蓋其法定利潤,這表明我們可能要三思而後行,不要過分依賴後者。過去12個月,儘管有人民幣1.577億元的盈利,但其實際上仍然有負面的自由現金流,流出了1.42億元,就像前面提到的那樣。在去年出現負面自由現金流的基礎上,我們可以想象一些股東可能會疑惑,今年人民幣1.42億元的現金消耗是否表明高風險。然而,這並不是考慮的全部。我們可以看到非常規因素已經影響了其法定利潤,從而影響了應計比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

除了稀釋之外,還應該注意的是,萬集科技在過去12個月中因不尋常項目獲得了價值人民幣3.5萬元的利潤。雖然我們希望看到利潤增加,但當這些不尋常項目對利潤做出重大貢獻時,我們會更加謹慎。我們對全球大部分上市公司的數據進行了分析,發現不尋常項目往往是一次性的。這正如我們所期望的那樣,因爲這些提升被描述爲"不尋常"。相對於其利潤而言,萬集科技在2021年12月前的不尋常項目貢獻大。因此,我們可以推斷出,這些不尋常項目正在使其財務利潤顯著增強。

The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by CN¥14m, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's as you'd expect, given these boosts are described as 'unusual'. Assuming those unusual items don't show up again in the current year, we'd thus expect profit to be weaker next year (in the absence of business growth, that is).

公司去年有飛凡項目增加了人民幣1400萬的利潤,可能在一定程度上可以解釋爲什麼其應計收益比率如此之低。我們不能否認,通常更高的利潤讓我們感到樂觀,但如果利潤能持續下去的話,我們更希望如此。當我們分析了全球絕大多數上市公司時,我們發現重大的飛凡項目往往不會重複出現。這也符合預期,因爲這些增益被描述爲「飛凡」。假設這些飛凡項目在當年不再出現,我們因此預計下一年的利潤會較弱(當然,這是在沒有業務增長的情況下)。

Our Take On GemPharmatech's Profit Performance

我們對GemPharmatech的利潤表現的看法

Summing up, GemPharmatech received a nice boost to profit from unusual items, but could not match its paper profit with free cash flow. For the reasons mentioned above, we think that a perfunctory glance at GemPharmatech's statutory profits might make it look better than it really is on an underlying level. So while earnings quality is important, it's equally important to consider the risks facing GemPharmatech at this point in time. For example, we've found that GemPharmatech has 2 warning signs (1 is significant!) that deserve your attention before going any further with your analysis.

總的來說,GemPharmatech從飛凡項目中獲得了利潤的良好增長,但卻不能用自由現金流來匹配其賬面利潤。基於上述原因,我們認爲草率地瀏覽GemPharmatech的財務報表可能會使其在潛在水平上看起來比實際情況要好。因此,儘管盈利質量很重要,但同樣重要的是考慮當前GemPharmatech面臨的風險。例如,我們發現GemPharmatech存在2個預警信號(其中1個非常重要!)在您繼續分析之前需要引起您的注意。

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

在本文中,我們展示了影響利潤數字的各種因素,並謹慎對待。但是,還有很多其他方法可以了解公司的情況。有些人認爲高回報股本回報率是一家優質企業的好跡象。雖然可能需要您自己進行一些研究,但您可能會發現此免費收藏的公司以高股本回報率爲榮,或此持有重要內部股份的股票清單可能會有所幫助。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論