Bunge Global SA's (NYSE:BG) Latest 3.1% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Bunge Global SA's (NYSE:BG) Latest 3.1% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Bunge Global's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Bunge Global的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
- 共有8名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
- 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解
Every investor in Bunge Global SA (NYSE:BG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 89% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
邦吉環球股份有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:BG)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲89%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 3.1% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 14% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Bunge Global, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了3.1%。最近的虧損加上股東一年的虧損14%,可能不適合這群投資者。機構或 「流動性提供者」 控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股價走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續下去,機構可能會面臨出售Bunge Global的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Bunge Global, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Bunge Global的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bunge Global?
關於邦吉環球,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
Bunge Global already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bunge Global's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
邦吉環球已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Bunge Global的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Bunge Global. Capital Research and Management Company is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 11% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對邦吉環球進行有意義的投資。資本研究與管理公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約12%和11%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現大股東中有8人約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Bunge Global
邦吉環球的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Bunge Global SA. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$127m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有邦吉環球股份有限公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值1.27億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司10%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Bunge Global better, we need to consider many other factors.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解邦吉環球,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。