Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD's (SZSE:300543) Soft Earnings Don't Show The Whole Picture
Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD's (SZSE:300543) Soft Earnings Don't Show The Whole Picture
Shenzhen Longood Intelligent Electric Co.,LTD's (SZSE:300543) recent soft profit numbers didn't appear to worry shareholders, as the stock price showed strength. However, we think the company is showing some signs that things are more promising than they seem.
深圳朗科智能電氣有限公司(SZSE:300543)最近的軟利潤數字似乎並未引起股東的擔憂,因爲股價表現強勁。然而,我們認爲公司正在顯示一些跡象,表明事情比看起來更有希望。

Examining Cashflow Against Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD's Earnings
對比 深圳朗科智能 有限公司 的現金流與營收
In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.
在高端金融中,用於衡量公司如何將報告的利潤轉化爲自由現金流(FCF)的關鍵比率是應計比率(從現金流量表中)。簡單地說,該比率將FCF減去淨利潤,然後將該數字除以該期間公司的平均運營資產。該比率向我們展示了公司利潤超過FCF的程度。
As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.
因此,負的應計比率對公司是積極的,而正的應計比率則是消極的。這並不意味着我們應該擔心正的應計比率,但值得注意的是應計比率相當高的地方。這是因爲一些學術研究表明,高應計比率往往導致較低的利潤或利潤增長。
For the year to June 2024, Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD had an accrual ratio of -0.15. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of CN¥173m, well over the CN¥40.4m it reported in profit. Notably, Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD had negative free cash flow last year, so the CN¥173m it produced this year was a welcome improvement.
截至2024年6月的一年中,深圳朗科智能有限公司的計提比率爲-0.15。因此,其法定盈利遠遠低於其自由現金流。事實上,在過去十二個月中,它報告了1.73億元人民幣的自由現金流,遠超過其報告的4040萬元利潤。值得注意的是,深圳朗科智能有限公司去年有負的自由現金流,因此今年生產的1.73億元人民幣是一個令人欣喜的改善。
Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD.
注意:我們始終建議投資者檢查資產負債表的實力。請點擊這裏查看我們對深圳朗科智能有限公司資產負債表的分析。
Our Take On Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD's Profit Performance
我們對朗科智能電氣股份有限公司的盈利表現看法
As we discussed above, Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD has perfectly satisfactory free cash flow relative to profit. Because of this, we think Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! On the other hand, its EPS actually shrunk in the last twelve months. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. For example, we've found that Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD has 3 warning signs (1 is a bit concerning!) that deserve your attention before going any further with your analysis.
正如我們上面所討論的,朗科智能電氣股份有限公司的自由現金流與利潤相比完全令人滿意。因此,我們認爲朗科智能電氣股份有限公司的盈利潛力至少和表面看起來一樣好,甚至更好!另一方面,其每股收益實際上在過去十二個月內有所下降。總之,如果您想全面了解該公司,不僅僅要考慮上述因素。因此,如果您希望深入了解這隻股票,必須考慮它面臨的任何風險。例如,我們發現朗科智能電氣股份有限公司有3個警示信號(1個令人有些擔憂!)在繼續分析之前,值得您關注。
This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Shenzhen Longood Intelligent ElectricLTD's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
本文僅關注了揭示朗科智能電氣股份有限公司盈利性質的單一因素。但有很多其他方法可以幫助您了解一家公司的情況。一些人認爲高淨資產收益率是一個優質企業的良好標誌。因此,您可能希望查看這些高淨資產收益率的公司的自由收藏,或者具有高內部所有權的股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。