Earnings Growth of 0.8% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for CITIC (HKG:267) Shareholders
Earnings Growth of 0.8% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for CITIC (HKG:267) Shareholders
For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But in any portfolio, there will be mixed results between individual stocks. So we wouldn't blame long term CITIC Limited (HKG:267) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 29% over a half decade.
對於許多人來說,投資的主要目的是獲得比整體市場更高的回報。但在任何投資組合中,個別股票的結果會有所不同。因此,我們不會責怪長揸中信股份有限公司(HKG:267)股票的股東對他們的持有決策產生懷疑,因爲這隻股票在過去的五年中下跌了29%。
After losing 3.9% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.
失去了3.9%後,值得調查該公司的基本面,以了解我們可以從過去的表現中推斷出什麼。
While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
雖然有效市場假說仍然被一些人教授,但被證明市場是過度反應的動態系統,投資者並不總是理性的。檢查市場情緒如何隨時間變化的一種方法是看一個公司的股價與其每股收益(EPS)之間的交互作用。
During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, CITIC actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 4.3% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.
在這個不幸的半個十年期間,中信實際上每年的每股收益(EPS)提高了4.3%。鑑於股價反應,人們可能會懷疑EPS在這段時間內不是對業務表現的良好指標(可能是由於一次性損失或收益)。或者,過去的增長預期可能過於不合理。
By glancing at these numbers, we'd posit that the the market had expectations of much higher growth, five years ago. Looking to other metrics might better explain the share price change.
通過查看這些數據,我們可以推測,五年前市場對增長的預期要高得多。觀察其他指標可能會更好地解釋股價的變化。
We note that the dividend has remained healthy, so that wouldn't really explain the share price drop. It's not immediately clear to us why the stock price is down but further research might provide some answers.
我們注意到股息仍然很健康,因此不能真正解釋股價下跌。我們不立即清楚股價下跌的原因,但進一步的研究可能會提供一些答案。
You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).
您可以看到以下收益和營收的變化情況(通過單擊圖像了解精確值)。
It's probably worth noting we've seen significant insider buying in the last quarter, which we consider a positive. On the other hand, we think the revenue and earnings trends are much more meaningful measures of the business. If you are thinking of buying or selling CITIC stock, you should check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
值得注意的是,在過去的一個季度中,我們看到了重要的內部買入行爲,我們認爲這是積極的。另一方面,我們認爲營業收入和收益趨勢更具有意義,是業務的更有意義的衡量標準。如果您考慮買入或賣出中信股票,您應該查看這份顯示分析師盈利預測的免費報告。
What About Dividends?
那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?
When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, CITIC's TSR for the last 5 years was -2.9%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.
在考慮投資回報時,重要的是要區分股東總回報(TSR)和股價回報之間的差異。股價回報僅反映股價的變化,TSR還包括股息的價值(假設它們被再投資)以及任何折價的募資或分拆的好處。可以說,TSR爲支付股息的股票提供了更完整的圖片。正如事實上所發生的,中信過去5年的TSR爲-2.9%,超過了前面提到的股價回報。公司支付的分紅因此推動了股東的總回報。
A Different Perspective
不同的觀點
It's nice to see that CITIC shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 4.4% over the last year. That's including the dividend. There's no doubt those recent returns are much better than the TSR loss of 0.6% per year over five years. We generally put more weight on the long term performance over the short term, but the recent improvement could hint at a (positive) inflection point within the business. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for CITIC that you should be aware of.
很高興看到中信股份(adr)的股東在過去一年收到了總股東回報率爲4.4%。 這已經包括了分紅派息。 毫無疑問,最近的回報要比過去5年的每年TSR損失0.6%要好得多。 我們通常更注重長期表現,而不是短期表現,但最近的改善可能暗示着業務內的(積極)拐點。 我發現長期股價作爲業務績效的替代指標非常有趣。 但要真正獲得深刻的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,我們已經發現中信股份(adr)有1個警告標誌,你應該注意。
CITIC is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of small cap companies at attractive valuations which insiders have been buying.
中信並不是內部人士在買入的唯一股票。所以看看這個免費的小盤公司名單,這些公司內部人士一直在買入,而且估值有吸引力。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了當前在香港證券交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。