share_log

Institutional Investors in IDT Corporation (NYSE:IDT) See US$61m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in IDT Corporation (NYSE:IDT) See US$61m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

紐交所(NYSE:IDT)交易日內製度投資者的市值上週減少了6100萬美元,儘管其長期收益一直受益。
Simply Wall St ·  09/12 06:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies IDT's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持有數量高意味着IDT的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

Every investor in IDT Corporation (NYSE:IDT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 46% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位在IDt Corporation(紐交所:IDT)投資的投資者都應該知道最強大的股東集團。機構持有46%的股份,是公司中持有最多股份的群體。換句話說,這個集團從他們對公司的投資中最有可能獲得最大的利潤(或損失)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$61m last week. Still, the 59% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

公司市值上週下降6100萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最高損失。儘管一年漲幅爲59%,但這可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。然而,他們可能對未來的損失感到擔憂。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about IDT.

讓我們仔細觀察一下不同類型的股東對IDt的影響。

big
NYSE:IDT Ownership Breakdown September 12th 2024
紐交所:IDt所有權分佈2024年9月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IDT?

機構投資者的持股情況給我們提供了關於IDT的信息。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that IDT does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of IDT, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到IDt確實有機構投資者; 他們持有公司的大部分股權。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。所以值得檢查IDt的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

big
NYSE:IDT Earnings and Revenue Growth September 12th 2024
紐交所:IDt的盈利和營業收入增長於2024年9月12日

IDT is not owned by hedge funds. Our data suggests that Howard Jonas, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 16%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.4% and 4.8% of the stock. In addition, we found that Samuel Jonas, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

IDt不是由對沖基金持有。我們的數據顯示,Howard Jonas,也是該公司的高級主要執行官,持有最多的股份達到16%。當內部人持有大量公司股票時,投資者將其視爲積極信號,因爲這意味着內部人願意將他們的財富與公司的未來聯繫在一起。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約5.4%和4.8%的股份。此外,我們發現,首席執行官Samuel Jonas將0.7%的股份分配給自己的名字。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更加深入的挖掘,我們發現前13名股東在該公司擁有51%的股權,這表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

普通公衆持有北方銅業的23%股份。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的命運,但它肯定會對公司運營方式產生真正的影響。

Insider Ownership Of IDT

IDT的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in IDT Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$927m, and insiders have US$176m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

根據我們的信息,內部人在IDt Corporation的持股數量很大。其市值僅爲9270百萬美元,並且內部人擁有價值1760百萬美元的股票。看到內部人如此投資於業務,實在是太棒了。值得注意的是,一定要查看這些內部人最近是否有買入股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in IDT. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個體投資者,在IDt公司持有22%的股份。儘管這樣的持股量可能不足以在決策過程中左右政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 14%, of the IDT stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

IDt股票似乎有14%由私人公司擁有。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司股份而非以個人身份對公共公司產生興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with IDT .

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該注意我們在IDt上發現的1個警示信號。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論