Individual Investors Invested in China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology Co., Ltd (SZSE:000733) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥1.1b Market Cap Decline
Individual Investors Invested in China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology Co., Ltd (SZSE:000733) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥1.1b Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 23% of China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology is held by Institutions
- 中國振華(集團)科技擁有大量個人投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 前18名股東擁有公司50%的股份
- 中國振華(集團)科技股份有23%由機構持有
A look at the shareholders of China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology Co., Ltd (SZSE:000733) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看中國振華(集團)科技股份有限公司(SZSE: 000733)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲47%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And following last week's 5.7% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.
繼上週股價下跌5.7%之後,個人投資者遭受的損失最大。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關中國振華(集團)科技的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology?
關於中國振華(集團)科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所見,機構投資者持有中國振華(集團)科技的相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到中國振華(集團)科學與技術的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology. The company's largest shareholder is China Electronics Corporation, with ownership of 31%. With 2.3% and 2.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, China Merchants Fund Management Company Ltd. and E Fund Management Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對中國振華(集團)科技進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是中國電子集團公司,所有權爲31%。招商基金管理有限公司和易方達管理有限公司分別擁有2.3%和2.2%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前18位的合計持有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology
中國振華(集團)科技的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology Co., Ltd. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥14m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有的中國振華(集團)科技有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,內部人士有可能通過更復雜的結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1400萬元人民幣的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 47% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
中國振華(集團)擁有47%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對中國振華(集團)科技有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 31%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的31%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for China Zhenhua (Group) Science & Technology that you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了中國振華(集團)科技的1個警告標誌,你應該注意這一點。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。