share_log

SJW Group (NYSE:SJW) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 78% of the Company

SJW Group (NYSE:SJW) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 78% of the Company

sjw group(紐交所:SJW)主要由機構股東控制,佔公司78%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  09/17 06:41

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in SJW Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構在sjw group的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響力
  • 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of SJW Group (NYSE:SJW) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 78% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看sjw group(紐交所:sjw)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。最大股份是由機構持有的,佔據了78%。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SJW Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關SJW Group的什麼信息。

big
NYSE:SJW Ownership Breakdown September 17th 2024
紐交所:SJW 所有權分佈 2024年9月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SJW Group?

機構持股告訴我們有關SJW Group的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

SJW Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SJW Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

SJW Group在股東名冊上已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司中佔有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們對其看好。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,大股價下跌並不罕見。因此值得檢查SJW Group的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:SJW Earnings and Revenue Growth September 17th 2024
紐交所:sjw集團2024年9月17日營收和收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in SJW Group. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.5% and 6.5% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能能夠對董事會的決策產生強大影響。我們注意到對沖基金對sjw集團沒有具體投資。 BlackRock, Inc.目前是最大的股東,持有17%的流通股。 相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有該股票的約7.5%和6.5%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of SJW Group

sjw集團內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in SJW Group. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$169m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據表明,在SJW Group,內部持有一些股份。這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。內部人士持有價值16900萬美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,值得注意的是,也許值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

我認爲查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但是爲了獲得真正的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險 - Cadence銀行有3個需要引起我們關注的警告信號。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand SJW Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - SJW Group has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

始終值得考慮一家公司的不同股東群體。但要更好地了解sjw group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例- sjw group有3個警告標誌(還有1個不能被忽視的),我們認爲您應該了解。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論