share_log

Returns At B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) Appear To Be Weighed Down

Returns At B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) Appear To Be Weighed Down

B&G Foods(紐交所:BGS)的回報似乎受到壓制
Simply Wall St ·  09/18 06:45

If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.

如果我們想找到一隻可以長期成倍增長的股票,我們應該尋找哪些潛在趨勢?一種常見的方法是嘗試尋找一家動用資本回報率(ROCE)不斷增加且所用資本不斷增加的公司。歸根結底,這表明這是一家以不斷提高的回報率對利潤進行再投資的企業。但是,在簡短地查看了這些數字之後,我們認爲B&G Foods(紐約證券交易所代碼:BGS)未來不具備多袋裝商的實力,但讓我們來看看爲什麼會這樣。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

什麼是資本使用回報率(ROCE)?

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for B&G Foods, this is the formula:

如果你以前沒有與ROCE合作過,它會衡量公司從其業務中使用的資本中產生的 「回報」(稅前利潤)。要計算 B&G Foods 的這個指標,公式如下:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.08 = US$230m ÷ (US$3.4b - US$490m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.08 = 2.3億美元 ÷(34億美元至4.9億美元)(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。

Therefore, B&G Foods has an ROCE of 8.0%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Food industry average of 11%.

因此,B&G Foods的投資回報率爲8.0%。歸根結底,這是一個低迴報,其表現低於食品行業11%的平均水平。

big
NYSE:BGS Return on Capital Employed September 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BGS 2024年9月18日動用資本回報率

Above you can see how the current ROCE for B&G Foods compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for B&G Foods .

上面你可以看到B&G Foods當前的投資回報率與其先前的資本回報率相比如何,但從過去可以看出來的只有那麼多。如果您有興趣,可以在我們的免費B&G Foods分析師報告中查看分析師的預測。

So How Is B&G Foods' ROCE Trending?

那麼 B&G Foods 的投資回報率趨勢如何呢?

There hasn't been much to report for B&G Foods' returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. This tells us the company isn't reinvesting in itself, so it's plausible that it's past the growth phase. So don't be surprised if B&G Foods doesn't end up being a multi-bagger in a few years time. That probably explains why B&G Foods has been paying out 86% of its earnings as dividends to shareholders. If the company is in fact lacking growth opportunities, that's one of the viable alternatives for the money.

關於B&G Foods的回報率及其資本利用水平,沒有太多可報告的,因爲這兩個指標在過去五年中一直保持穩定。這告訴我們該公司沒有對自己進行再投資,因此它已經過了增長階段是合理的。因此,如果B&G Foods在幾年後沒有成爲一家多口袋公司,也不要感到驚訝。這也許可以解釋爲什麼B&G Foods將其收益的86%作爲股息支付給股東。如果公司實際上缺乏增長機會,那是可行的資金替代方案之一。

Our Take On B&G Foods' ROCE

我們對 B&G Foods 投資回報率的看法

In a nutshell, B&G Foods has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. Since the stock has declined 33% over the last five years, investors may not be too optimistic on this trend improving either. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.

簡而言之,在過去的五年中,B&G Foods一直在努力從相同數量的資本中獲得相同的回報。由於該股在過去五年中下跌了33%,因此投資者對這一趨勢的改善可能也不太樂觀。總而言之,多裝袋機的固有趨勢並不常見,因此,如果您想要這樣做,我們認爲您在其他地方可能會有更多的運氣。

Since virtually every company faces some risks, it's worth knowing what they are, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for B&G Foods (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) that you should know about.

由於幾乎每家公司都面臨一些風險,因此值得了解它們是什麼,我們已經發現了B&G Foods的3個警告信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂!)你應該知道的。

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

如果你想尋找收益豐厚的穩健公司,可以免費查看這份資產負債表良好且股本回報率可觀的公司名單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論