Newegg Commerce, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NEGG) Market Cap up US$52m Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 58% as Well as Insiders
Newegg Commerce, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NEGG) Market Cap up US$52m Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 58% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Newegg Commerce's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 58% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Hangzhou Lianluo Interactive Information Technology Co.,Ltd)
- 32% of Newegg Commerce is held by insiders
- Newegg Commerce的重要私營公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大的公衆股東的影響
- 該公司58%的股份由一家股東(Hangzhou Lianluo Interactive Information Technology Co.,Ltd)持有
- Newegg Commerce的32%股份由內部持有者持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NASDAQ:NEGG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NASDAQ:NEGG),了解該業務的所有權結構至關重要。我們可以看到私營公司擁有該公司58%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)
Private companies gained the most after market cap touched US$292m last week, while insiders who own 32% also benefitted.
私人公司在上週市值觸及2.92億美元后獲得了最大收益,持有32%股份的內部人員也受益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Newegg Commerce.
讓我們更仔細地看一看,看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於新蛋商城的什麼。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Newegg Commerce?
機構持有缺失對新蛋商城有何含義?
Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.
機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Newegg Commerce's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
爲何機構不持有股票有多種解釋。最常見的情況是,相對於管理下的資金來說,公司規模太小,因此機構不會費心仔細研究公司。還有可能是基金經理不持有這支股票,因爲他們不相信它會表現良好。新蛋商城的盈利和營業收入歷史數據(如下)可能沒能說服機構投資者,或者他們根本沒有仔細研究過這家企業。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Newegg Commerce. Hangzhou Lianluo Interactive Information Technology Co.,Ltd is currently the largest shareholder, with 58% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 32% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Faching Chang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.
我們注意到,對新蛋商城沒有有意義的投資的對沖基金。杭州聯絡互動信息科技有限公司目前是最大股東,持有58%的股份。這基本上意味着他們對公司未來有着廣泛的影響力,甚至可能是對公司未來有着絕對控制。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約32%的股份,第三大股東持有0.1%的股份。第二大股東張發清也恰好是公司的首席重要高管。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況
Insider Ownership Of Newegg Commerce
新蛋商城的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Newegg Commerce, Inc.. Insiders have a US$93m stake in this US$292m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士持有着Newegg Commerce, Inc.的相當比例股份。內部人士在這家市值9270萬美元的公司中持有9300萬美元的股份。我們可以說這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司規模仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是公司的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通大衆--包括零售投資者--擁有公司10%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種所有權規模很大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 58%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私人公司持有該公司發行的股份中的58%。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司的所有權。有時,內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Newegg Commerce you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.
雖然考慮公司的不同股東群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以此爲例:我們發現了Newegg Commerce的兩個警示信號,您應該意識到其中一個可能很嚴重。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。