Institutional Investors of Avadel Pharmaceuticals Plc (NASDAQ:AVDL) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 3.9% Drop
Institutional Investors of Avadel Pharmaceuticals Plc (NASDAQ:AVDL) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 3.9% Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Avadel Pharmaceuticals' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 鑑於機構在股票中持有大量股權,Avadel Pharmaceuticals的股票價格可能受到他們的交易決策的影響。
- 前6名股東持有公司51%的股份。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
If you want to know who really controls Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (NASDAQ:AVDL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着Avadel Pharmaceuticals股份有限公司(NASDAQ:AVDL),那麼你就要看看它的股權登記冊構成。機構擁有該公司的最高比例83%的股份。換句話說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最大(或者如果出現衰退,將損失最大)。
And last week, institutional endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 3.9%.
上週,機構遭受了最大的損失,股票下跌了3.9%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Avadel Pharmaceuticals.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Avadel Pharmaceuticals的不同所有權組。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Avadel Pharmaceuticals?
機構所有權告訴我們有關Avadel Pharmaceuticals的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Avadel Pharmaceuticals. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Avadel Pharmaceuticals, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在avadel pharmaceuticals持有相當數量的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果有兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查avadel pharmaceuticals的過去收入軌跡(下方)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 6.0% of Avadel Pharmaceuticals shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that Janus Henderson Group plc is the largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.0% by the third-largest shareholder.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會對董事會決策產生強烈影響。看起來對沖基金擁有Avadel製藥股票的6.0%。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來變革,從而爲股東創造近期價值。我們的數據顯示,珍妮絲•亨德森集團有限公司是最大的股東,持有25%的流通股。作爲背景,第二大股東持有流通股的約6.8%,其次是第三大股東持有6.0%的股份。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Avadel Pharmaceuticals
Avadel製藥股票內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$10m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據表明,內部持有的人在avadel pharmaceuticals plc中持有不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部持有價值1000萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一些內部持有總是好的,但也值得查看這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Avadel Pharmaceuticals. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Avadel Pharmaceuticals持有10%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Avadel Pharmaceuticals better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Avadel Pharmaceuticals has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
有必要考慮擁有一家公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解avadel pharmaceuticals,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例——avadel pharmaceuticals有1個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。