Sutro Biopharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:STRO) Institutional Investors Lost 16% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Sutro Biopharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:STRO) Institutional Investors Lost 16% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Sutro Biopharma's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 由於機構股東持有Sutro Biopharma的大量股份,該公司股價可能受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前12個股東持有業務的51%。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:STRO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制着sutro biopharma公司(納斯達克代碼:STRO),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。擁有最大股份的群體是持有57%所有權的機構。換句話說,該群體從對該公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 16% in value last week. However, the 14% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧錢,尤其是上週看到自己的持股價值下跌了16%的機構投資者。然而,對股東的一年14%的回報可能已經減輕了衝擊。然而,我們可以假設他們會警惕未來的弱點。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sutro Biopharma.
在下面的圖表中,我們將放大觀察Sutro Biopharma的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sutro Biopharma?
機構股東分佈揭示了Sutro Biopharma的哪些信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Sutro Biopharma. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sutro Biopharma's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Sutro Biopharma中持有相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所呈現的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在它們處於'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多個方將可能競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Sutro Biopharma的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 20% of Sutro Biopharma shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Suvretta Capital Management, LLC with 9.4% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 5.4% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。目前看來,sutro biopharma股份中有20%受到對沖基金的控制。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。很多投資者希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是Suvretta Capital Management,LLC持有已發行股份的9.4%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約8.4%和5.4%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
看一下股東註冊表,我們可以看到前12大股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Sutro Biopharma
Sutro Biopharma的內部股東持股情況。該公司的市值僅爲2.83億美元,上市公司高管和內部人員持有約300萬美元的股票。一些人會說,這顯示了股東與管理層之間的契合度。但是值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在賣出股票。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Sutro Biopharma, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$3.4m worth of the US$321m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
股東可能會對知道公司sutro biopharma的內部人員持股感興趣。作爲個人,內部人員共持有該公司價值340萬美元的股份,該公司總價值爲32100萬美元。看到內部人員有一定投資是好事,但值得注意的是,可能需要查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sutro Biopharma. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般大衆擁有21%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對sutro biopharma有一定程度的影響力。儘管這一持股比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Sutro Biopharma has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司所有權的確很有趣。但要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例 - sutro biopharma有3個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。