Retail Investors in Shede Spirits Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600702) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 4.8% Last Week
Retail Investors in Shede Spirits Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600702) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 4.8% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Shede Spirits' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 46% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 13% of Shede Spirits is held by Institutions
- 捨得酒業重要的零售投資者擁有權益,表明關鍵決策受到更廣大公衆股東的影響
- 前25名股東持有46%的股份。
- 13%的捨得酒業股份由機構持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shede Spirits Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600702), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解捨得酒業(SHSE:600702)真正控制權歸屬,重要的是了解業務的所有權結構。 擁有最大股份的是擁有53%股權的零售投資者群體。 換句話說,該群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)
As a result, retail investors collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥14b market cap following a 4.8% gain in the stock.
由於公司股價上漲4.8%,達到了140億人民幣的市值,因此,上週零售投資者共同獲得了最高分。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shede Spirits.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注捨得酒業不同的股權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shede Spirits?
機構持股情況對我們如何看待捨得酒業有所啓示。捨得酒業已經有機構進入股權登記簿。 事實上,它們在公司中擁有不少股份,這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。 如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時出售股票,那麼很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得注意的是,應該檢查捨得酒業的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要記住還有其他的因素需要考慮。
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shede Spirits. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shede Spirits' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所見,機構投資者在捨得酒業擁有相當大比重。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時會犯錯。當多家機構持有某隻股票時,總有一種風險,即可能會陷入"擁擠交易"。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史記錄的公司中,這種風險會更高。您可以在下面看到捨得酒業的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shede Spirits. Our data shows that Fosun International Holdings Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.0% by the third-largest shareholder.
我們注意到,對捨得酒業來說,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示覆星國際控股有限公司是最大的股東,持有30%的股份。爲了更好理解,第二大股東持有約5.0%的流通股,緊隨其後的是第三大股東持有3.0%的流通股。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Shede Spirits
擁有該公司49%股份的普通公衆,主要是由個人投資者組成,對捨得酒業有一定的影響力。儘管該組織不一定能左右決策,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實質性的影響。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Shede Spirits Co., Ltd.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥21m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,捨得酒業股份有限公司的內部持有人持有不到1%的股份。 但他們可能通過我們尚未掌握的公司結構間接持有利益。 這是一家相當大的公司,董事會成員可能擁有對公司的意義重大的利益,而不擁有相應比例的利益。 在這種情況下,他們持有價值約爲2100萬人民幣的股份(按當前價格計算)。 可以說,最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。 您可以在此處查看內部持有人是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 53% of Shede Spirits. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
一般公衆包括零售投資者在捨得酒業股份佔有53%。 這種所有權水平讓更廣泛的公衆投資者有權力影響關鍵政策決策,如董事會構成、執行薪酬和股利支付比率。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 33%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
雖然考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。考慮風險,例如。每個公司都有風險,我們發現羅博特科智能技術有3個警告信號,您應該知道。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Shede Spirits (including 1 which is a bit unpleasant) .
我發現查看公司的股東很有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們在捨得酒業發現的2個警示信號(其中1個有點不愉快)。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。