With 78% Institutional Ownership, WaFd, Inc. (NASDAQ:WAFD) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 78% Institutional Ownership, WaFd, Inc. (NASDAQ:WAFD) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in WaFd implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構大量持有WaFd的股份,意味着他們對公司的股價有重要的影響力。
- 10個投資者擁有該公司51%的股權。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
Every investor in WaFd, Inc. (NASDAQ:WAFD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 78% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位WAFD, Inc. (納斯達克:wafd)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司78%的股權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下降風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of WaFd, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探究WaFd的每種業主類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WaFd?
機構持股信息告訴我們關於WaFd什麼?WaFd已經有機構投資者持有股權。他們擁有公司的尊重股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票,他們也喜歡它。但是,和其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,股價可能會快速下降。因此,值得關注WaFd以下的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in WaFd. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of WaFd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
從這裏可以看出,機構投資者在wafd中持有相當大量的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會的那樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售某隻股票,很常見會導致股價大幅下跌。因此,值得查看wafd過去的收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. WaFd is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 13%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 6.9% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過半數已發行股份,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。 WaFd不屬於對沖基金。 該公司最大的股東是BlackRock,持有13%的股份。 其次是持有公司普通股11%的The Vanguard Group,Dimensional Fund Advisors LP持有約6.9%的公司股份。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進一步了解到,前10大股東持有通富微電大約51%的註冊資本,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,能夠在某種程度上平衡彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of WaFd
WaFd的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in WaFd, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$32m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會感興趣地了解,在 WaFd 公司,內部持有股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在有意義的對齊通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約3200萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這顯示了股東與董事會之間利益的一致性。不過,也值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有該公司21%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以使決策有利於他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with WaFd .
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。因此,您應該注意我們發現的wafd存在的1個警示標誌。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。