share_log

Scholar Education Group's (HKG:1769) Soft Earnings Don't Show The Whole Picture

Scholar Education Group's (HKG:1769) Soft Earnings Don't Show The Whole Picture

學者教育集團(HKG:1769)的業績不佳並不完全反映實際情況
Simply Wall St ·  09/23 18:53

The market for Scholar Education Group's (HKG:1769) shares didn't move much after it posted weak earnings recently. We think that the softer headline numbers might be getting counterbalanced by some positive underlying factors.

Scholar Education Group(HKG: 1769)在最近公佈疲軟的收益後,其股票市場沒有太大波動。我們認爲,較疲軟的標題數字可能會被一些積極的潛在因素所抵消。

big
SEHK:1769 Earnings and Revenue History September 23rd 2024
SEHK: 1769 2024 年 9 月 23 日的收益和收入記錄

A Closer Look At Scholar Education Group's Earnings

仔細研究學者教育集團的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

在高級財務中,用於衡量公司將報告的利潤轉換爲自由現金流(FCF)的關鍵比率是應計比率(來自現金流)。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先從一段時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均運營資產。該比率向我們顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的程度。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,當公司的應計比率爲負時,這實際上被認爲是一件好事,但如果其應計比率爲正,則是一件壞事。雖然應計比率高於零並不令人擔憂,但我們確實認爲,當公司的應計比率相對較高時,值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年發表的一篇論文,「應計額較高的公司將來的利潤往往會降低」。

For the year to June 2024, Scholar Education Group had an accrual ratio of -0.39. That indicates that its free cash flow quite significantly exceeded its statutory profit. In fact, it had free cash flow of CN¥181m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of CN¥125.7m. Scholar Education Group's free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. Having said that, there is more to the story. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

在截至2024年6月的一年中,學者教育集團的應計比率爲-0.39。這表明其自由現金流大大超過了其法定利潤。實際上,它去年的自由現金流爲18100萬元人民幣,遠遠超過了其12570萬元人民幣的法定利潤。Scholar Education Group的自由現金流比去年有所改善,總體而言,這是值得期待的。話雖如此,故事還有更多。我們可以看到,不尋常的項目影響了其法定利潤,從而影響了應計比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

不尋常物品對利潤的影響

While the accrual ratio might bode well, we also note that Scholar Education Group's profit was boosted by unusual items worth CN¥20m in the last twelve months. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. If Scholar Education Group doesn't see that contribution repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to drop over the current year.

儘管應計率可能是個好兆頭,但我們還注意到,在過去的十二個月中,價值2000萬元人民幣的不尋常項目提振了學者教育集團的利潤。雖然獲得更高的利潤總是件好事,但來自不尋常物品的巨額捐款有時會抑制我們的熱情。我們統計了全球大多數上市公司的數字,不尋常的物品在自然界中很常見。考慮到這個名字,這並不奇怪。如果Scholar Education Group認爲捐款不會重演,那麼在其他條件相同的情況下,我們預計其本年度的利潤將下降。

Our Take On Scholar Education Group's Profit Performance

我們對學者教育集團盈利表現的看法

In conclusion, Scholar Education Group's accrual ratio suggests its statutory earnings are of good quality, but on the other hand the profits were boosted by unusual items. Considering all the aforementioned, we'd venture that Scholar Education Group's profit result is a pretty good guide to its true profitability, albeit a bit on the conservative side. If you'd like to know more about Scholar Education Group as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Scholar Education Group you should be aware of.

總之,Scholar Education Group的應計比率表明其法定收益質量良好,但另一方面,利潤是由不尋常的項目提振的。考慮到上述所有因素,我們認爲Scholar Education Group的盈利業績可以很好地指導其真正的盈利能力,儘管有點保守。如果您想進一步了解Scholar Education Group作爲一家企業,請務必了解其面臨的任何風險。一個很好的例子:我們發現了學者教育小組的1個警告信號,你應該注意。

Our examination of Scholar Education Group has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

我們對Scholar Education Group的審查側重於某些可能使其收益看起來好於實際的因素。但是,如果你能夠將注意力集中在細節上,總會有更多的事情需要發現。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 「關注資金」,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這份免費收集的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份擁有大量內幕持股的股票清單很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論