With 70% Ownership, Simmons First National Corporation (NASDAQ:SFNC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 70% Ownership, Simmons First National Corporation (NASDAQ:SFNC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Simmons First National implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構對Simmons First National的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響
- 前12名股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Simmons First National Corporation (NASDAQ:SFNC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 70% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
想要了解誰真正控制着Simmons First National Corporation(納斯達克:SFNC),重要的是要了解公司的所有權結構。 機構持有70%的股份,在該公司擁有最大股份。 換句話說,該團體將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Simmons First National.
在下面的圖表中,我們將放大 Simmons First National 的不同所有權群體。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Simmons First National?
機構持股告訴我們關於辛蒙斯第一國民的情況
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Simmons First National already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Simmons First National's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Simmons First National 已經擁有機構在股份登記冊上。實際上,他們在公司擁有一定比例的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區享有一定程度的信譽。然而,最好要警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下降。因此,值得查看 Simmons First National 的下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Simmons First National. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 5.8% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對於Simmons First National,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是BlackRock, Inc.擁有14%的流通股份。第二大股東爲The Vanguard Group, Inc.擁有公司11%的普通股,而Dimensional Fund Advisors LP持有約5.8%的公司股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我們對所有權的深入研究表明,前12名股東合計擁有50%的持股,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Simmons First National
辛蒙斯第一國民的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in Simmons First National Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$46m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到,內部持有人持有simmons first national公司的股份。 內部持有人持有價值4600萬美元的重要股份。 大多數人會將此視爲真正的積極因素。 如果您想探討內部人員對齊的問題,可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Simmons First National. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有28%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對simmons first national產生了一定程度的影響。 雖然這一群體不一定能左右決策,但肯定能對公司的經營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Simmons First National better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Simmons First National .
考慮公司股份持有者的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解辛蒙斯第一國家,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的辛蒙斯第一國家的1個警示信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。