share_log

Institutional Investors in Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE:LMND) Lost 4.5% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE:LMND) Lost 4.5% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

紐交所上的檸檬公司(NYSE:LMND)的機構投資者上週損失了4.5%,但在長期增長中獲益。
Simply Wall St ·  09/24 08:07

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lemonade's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Lemonade的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 50% 的業務由前9名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE:LMND), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 47% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Lemonade, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:LMND),了解業務的所有權結構很重要。機構擁有47%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 4.5% in value last week. However, the 49% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降4.5%的機構投資者。但是,49%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lemonade, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Lemonade的每種類型的所有者。

big
NYSE:LMND Ownership Breakdown September 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LMND 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lemonade?

關於檸檬水,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lemonade. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lemonade, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在Lemonade中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Lemonade過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:LMND Earnings and Revenue Growth September 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LMND 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 24 日

Lemonade is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Softbank Group Capital Limited is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.5% and 5.7% of the stock.

檸檬水不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,軟銀集團資本有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的17%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.5%和5.7%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Lemonade

檸檬水的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Lemonade, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$74m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有Lemonade, Inc.的部分股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約7400萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lemonade. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Lemonade擁有28%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Lemonade有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 17% stake in Lemonade. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有Lemonade17%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Lemonade that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Lemonade的1個警告信號,在這裏投資之前你應該注意這個信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論