These 4 Measures Indicate That Valmont Industries (NYSE:VMI) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well
These 4 Measures Indicate That Valmont Industries (NYSE:VMI) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Valmont Industries, Inc. (NYSE:VMI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過多可能會導致破產。我們注意到維蒙特工業(NYSE:VMI)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使得公司變得風險更大。
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
一般來說,當一家公司不能輕鬆地通過籌集資本或自己的現金流來償還債務時,債務才真正成爲現實問題。如果公司不能履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能一無所獲。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,其必須以低價籌集新的股權資本,從而永久性地稀釋股東。通過取代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業的極好工具。考慮一家企業使用多少債務時,首先要做的是查看其現金和債務。
How Much Debt Does Valmont Industries Carry?
維蒙特工業承擔了多少債務?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Valmont Industries had debt of US$1.02b, up from US$955.7m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$163.1m, its net debt is less, at about US$856.8m.
下面的圖片顯示,您可以點擊以查看更詳細信息,在2024年6月,維蒙特工業的債務爲10.2億美元,比一年前的9,557萬美元增加。然而,由於其有一個1.631億美元的現金儲備,其淨債務更少,約爲8,568萬美元。
How Healthy Is Valmont Industries' Balance Sheet?
維蒙特工業的資產負債表表現如何?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Valmont Industries had liabilities of US$705.0m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.23b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$163.1m as well as receivables valued at US$895.1m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$881.2m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,維蒙特工業有短期到期的負債爲7.05億美元,而超過一年到期的負債爲12.3億美元。 抵消這些義務,該公司持有1.631億美元的現金以及12個月內到期的價值8.95億美元的應收賬款。 因此,其負債總額達到8.812億美元,超過了其現金和短期應收賬款的總和。
Of course, Valmont Industries has a market capitalization of US$5.69b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
當然,維蒙特工業的市值爲56.9億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以管理的。 話雖如此,明顯我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以防止出現惡化情況。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
Valmont Industries has net debt of just 1.4 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 9.5 times the interest expense over the last year. Fortunately, Valmont Industries grew its EBIT by 4.6% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Valmont Industries can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
維蒙特工業的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的1.4倍,表明其絕對不是一個魯莽的借款人。 而這一觀點得到了堅實的利息支付能力的支持,過去一年的EBIT是利息費用的9.5倍。 幸運的是,維蒙特工業在過去一年中將其EBIT增長了4.6%,使得債務負擔看起來更加可控。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。 但最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定維蒙特工業是否能夠隨時間加強其資產負債表。 因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看該免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的利潤預測。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Valmont Industries recorded free cash flow of 37% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,雖然稅務部門可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受真金白銀。 因此,合乎邏輯的下一步是查看EBIT中實際自由現金流量所佔比例。 查看最近三年,維蒙特工業記錄的自由現金流佔其EBIT的37%,低於我們的預期。 這種弱勢現金轉換使其更難處理債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
On our analysis Valmont Industries's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For example, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow makes us a little nervous about its debt. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that Valmont Industries is managing its debt quite well. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Valmont Industries has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
根據我們的分析,維蒙特工業的利率期貨覆蓋應該表明它不會在償還債務方面遇到太多麻煩。但是我們上面提到的其他因素並不那麼令人鼓舞。例如,它將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的能力讓我們對其債務感到有些緊張。當我們考慮以上提到的所有因素時,我們認爲維蒙特工業在處理債務方面表現得相當不錯。話雖如此,負擔足夠沉重,我們建議股東們密切關注。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上最能了解債務情況。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表內 - 遠非如此。例如 - 維蒙特工業存在4個警示信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。