Private Companies Invested in Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300558) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥1.7b Market Cap Decline
Private Companies Invested in Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300558) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥1.7b Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
主要見解
- Betta Pharmaceuticals' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 51% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in Betta Pharmaceuticals is 14%
- 貝達藥業的重要民營公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
- 前9大股東持有公司的51%股份。
- 貝達藥業的機構持股比例爲14%
Every investor in Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300558) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
華潮製藥公司(SZSE:300558)的每位投資者都應該意識到最具影響力的股東團體。持有該公司最多股票的團體,約佔公司股份的41%,是民營公司。也就是說,該團體將在股價上漲時獲益最多(或在股價下跌時損失最多)。
As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥1.7b.
因此,在市值下跌CN¥1.7億後,私人公司作爲一個整體遭受了上週最大的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Betta Pharmaceuticals.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於貝達藥業的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Betta Pharmaceuticals?
機構持股告訴我們什麼關於貝達藥業?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Betta Pharmaceuticals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Betta Pharmaceuticals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到貝達藥業確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票,他們喜歡它。但跟其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果多家機構同時改變他們對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下貝達藥業的收入歷史記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Betta Pharmaceuticals. Ningbo Kaiming Investment Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) is currently the company's largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. With 13% and 6.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Zhejiang Jihe Venture Capital Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Terui Xichuang Enterprise Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.
對貝達藥業而言,對沖基金持有的股份不多。寧波凱明投資管理合夥企業(有限合夥)目前是公司最大的股東,持有19%的流通股。分別持有13%和6.9%的流通股,浙江吉和創投有限公司和杭州特瑞喜創企業管理合夥企業(有限合夥)是第二大和第三大股東。
We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了進一步的挖掘,並發現前9大股東持有該公司股份的51%左右,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Betta Pharmaceuticals
貝達藥業內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own CN¥558m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告說,貝達藥業股份有限公司的內部人士擁有股份。這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是好的。內部人士擁有價值人民幣55800萬的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性。但仍然值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 41% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆(包括個人投資者)佔該公司的41%股份,因此不能輕易忽視他們。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決定朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 41%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私人公司持有已發行股份的41%。值得深入研究。如果相關方,如內部人士,在其中一傢俬人公司中有利益,則應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Betta Pharmaceuticals better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Betta Pharmaceuticals has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
考慮到不同持有公司股份的群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解貝達藥業,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例 - 貝達藥業有1個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。