CloudWalk Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688327) Market Cap Surged CN¥498m Last Week, Retail Investors Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
CloudWalk Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688327) Market Cap Surged CN¥498m Last Week, Retail Investors Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over CloudWalk Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 49% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 零售投資者對CloudWalk Technology擁有重要控制權,這意味着普通大衆對管理和治理決策有更大的影響力
- 前25名股東持有49%的業務。
- 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of CloudWalk Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688327), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
爲了了解誰真正控制着CloudWalk Technology Co., Ltd.(SHSE:688327),重要的是要了解企業的所有權結構。持有最大份額的群體是零售投資者,佔有50%的所有權。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, retail investors collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥8.3b market cap following a 6.4% gain in the stock.
作爲結果,隨着股票上漲6.4%,公司市值達到了83億元人民幣,零售投資者上週整體獲得了最高分。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CloudWalk Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究CloudWalk Technology的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CloudWalk Technology?
機構股東持股量對CloudWalk Technology有何指示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CloudWalk Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CloudWalk Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在雲從科技擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中享有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售一隻股票,常常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得查看雲從科技的過往收益軌跡(以下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CloudWalk Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Changzhou Cloudwalk Information Technology Co., Ltd. with 20% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Pci Technology Group Co.,Ltd. and Ningbo Meishan Bonded Port Area Yunyi Zhongmou Investment Management Partnership Enterprise (LP), with an equal amount of shares to their name at 4.6%.
我們注意到對於CloudWalk Technology,對沖基金並沒有意義的投資。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是常州雲眸信息技術有限公司,持有20% 的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是佳都科技集團有限公司和寧波梅山保稅港區雲誼中謀投資管理合夥企業(有限合夥),他們的股份佔比都爲4.6%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。分析師觀點也可以達到相同的目的。我們的信息表明,這隻股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,所以它可能不是很出名。
Insider Ownership Of CloudWalk Technology
CloudWalk Technology內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我們的數據無法確認董事會成員個人持有股份。由於我們不能獲悉內部持股情況,因此可能存在缺失數據。因此,評估首席執行官的報酬和任期很有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 50% stake in CloudWalk Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在雲從科技擁有相當大的50%股份,表明它是一支相當受歡迎的股票。 這種所有權規模賦予了來自普通大衆的投資者一定的集體力量。 他們可以並且很可能影響對執行薪酬、股息政策和擬議的業務收購決策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 36%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有發行的36%的股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過掌握私人公司而非個人身份來掌握公開上市公司的利益。雖然很難得出任何廣義的結論,但值得將其作爲進一步研究的一個重點。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 4.6% of the CloudWalk Technology shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有CloudWalk Technology發行股份的4.6%。我們無法確定,但很可能這是一種戰略性持股。這些業務可能相似,或者彼此合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CloudWalk Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that CloudWalk Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
值得考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解CloudWalk Technology,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,CloudWalk Technology 在我們的投資分析中顯示出 1 個警告信號,您應該了解...
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。