Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Jun Zhai Must Be Pleased With the Recent 11% Gain
Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Jun Zhai Must Be Pleased With the Recent 11% Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Vanjee Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 內部人似乎對萬集科技的增長有着極大的利益,從他們持有的大量股權來看
- 前8大股東擁有公司50%的股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
A look at the shareholders of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300552) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 50% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看萬集科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300552)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。擁有最大股份的群體是擁有50%股權的個人內部人士。換句話說,這個群體最有可能(或者最有可能失去)從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多的收益。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 11% gain.
因此,內部人士是上週11%漲幅的最大受益者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Vanjee Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解萬集科技每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vanjee Technology?
機構對萬集科技的佔股比例非常小。這表明公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前並不是專業投資者特別青睞的對象。如果公司收益增長,可能表明這種情況剛開始引起深袋投資者們的注意。如果有多個機構投資者同時試圖購買一隻股票,股票價格上漲也並不罕見。因此,請考慮下面的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住,最重要的是未來。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Vanjee Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
機構在萬集科技中持有的股份非常小。這表明該公司受到一些基金的關注,但當下並不特別受到專業投資者的青睞。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而改進,我們很可能會在未來看到更多機構買家。當多個機構投資者想要購買股票時,通常會看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入軌跡(如下所示)可能是未來增長的一個指標,但並不能保證。
Vanjee Technology is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Jun Zhai is the largest shareholder with 41% of shares outstanding. With 5.0% and 1.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Xue Jun Cui and Lin Yan Tian are the second and third largest shareholders. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Lin Yan Tian is also a Member of Corporate Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
萬集科技不是由對沖基金擁有。該公司的CEO翟軍擁有41%的股份,屬於最大的股東。分別擁有5.0%和1.8%的股份的蔡學軍和田臨諺,是第二和第三大股東。有趣的是,第三大股東田臨諺還是公司董事會成員,再次表明公司高層股東擁有廣泛的內部所有權。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們對Brookfield Infrastructure有了更深入的了解,發現前8位股東佔持股比例的約50%,這意味着除了大股東外還有少數小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of Vanjee Technology
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有萬集科技股份有限公司的47%的股份。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以扭轉政策決策,但他們仍然可以對企業政策產生集體影響。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥3.0b worth of shares in the CN¥6.1b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部持有人擁有萬集科技股份有限公司的相當比例。內部持有人在總值6100000000人民幣的公司中持有30億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 48% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
私人公司擁有廣晟有色金屬股份有限公司的42%股份。深入挖掘一下或許會很有價值。如果關聯方,例如內部人員,對其中一個私營公司感興趣,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Vanjee Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Vanjee Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.
思考擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解萬集科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了一條針對萬集科技的警告標誌,您在投資之前應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。