share_log

Is ADAMA (SZSE:000553) A Risky Investment?

Is ADAMA (SZSE:000553) A Risky Investment?

ADAMA(SZSE:000553)是一項風險投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  09/24 23:19

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, ADAMA Ltd. (SZSE:000553) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

當David Iben說:'波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失。'所以看來聰明的錢知道,債務是破產中通常涉及的一個非常重要的因素,當您評估一個公司的風險性時。重要的是,中華農業(深交所:000553)確實有債務。但這些債務會讓股東擔心嗎?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業成長的一種工具,但如果企業無力償還貸款,那麼它就存在於貸款方的掌握之中。最終,如果公司不能履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能一分不剩。然而,更常見的(但仍然是昂貴的)情況是,公司必須以低廉的股票價格稀釋股東,以便控制債務。當然,許多公司使用債務籌資增長,沒有任何負面後果。在我們考慮債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平兩者同時考慮。

What Is ADAMA's Net Debt?

亞達華的淨債務是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that ADAMA had debt of CN¥18.6b at the end of June 2024, a reduction from CN¥19.8b over a year. On the flip side, it has CN¥4.08b in cash leading to net debt of about CN¥14.5b.

下面的圖片顯示,您可以點擊以獲取更詳細信息,顯示中華農業於2024年6月底的債務爲186億人民幣,比一年前的198億人民幣減少。另一方面,它有40.8億人民幣的現金,導致淨債務約爲145億人民幣。

big
SZSE:000553 Debt to Equity History September 25th 2024
中華農業(深交所:000553)資產負債比歷史數據2024年9月25日

How Healthy Is ADAMA's Balance Sheet?

ADAMA的資產負債表有多健康?

According to the last reported balance sheet, ADAMA had liabilities of CN¥17.7b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥14.2b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥4.08b and CN¥9.87b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total CN¥17.9b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

根據最近公佈的資產負債表,ADAMA在12個月內到期的負債爲177億人民幣,在12個月後到期的負債爲142億人民幣。另一方面,它持有40.8億人民幣的現金和98.7億人民幣的應收款項,這意味着其負債總計超過179億人民幣,超過了現金和短期應收款項的總和。

This deficit casts a shadow over the CN¥10.2b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. After all, ADAMA would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

這個赤字給這家102億人民幣的公司投下了一層陰影,就像巨人屹立在普通人之上。因此,我們認爲股東們需要密切關注這一點。畢竟,如果ADAMA必須今天償付其債權人,很可能需要進行一項重大的再資本化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Weak interest cover of 0.0079 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 14.2 hit our confidence in ADAMA like a one-two punch to the gut. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. Even worse, ADAMA saw its EBIT tank 100% over the last 12 months. If earnings continue to follow that trajectory, paying off that debt load will be harder than convincing us to run a marathon in the rain. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if ADAMA can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

0.0079倍的薄弱利息盈利倍數和14.2倍的擾人的淨債務與息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比例讓我們對ADAMA的信懇智能受到了重擊。這意味着我們可能會認爲它承擔着沉重的債務負擔。更糟糕的是,ADAMA在過去12個月裏看到其EBIt暴跌了100%。如果收入繼續沿着這個軌跡發展,償還那筆債務將會比說服我們在雨中參加馬拉松更困難。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上對債務了解最多。但最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定ADAMA能否長期強化其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會覺得分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, ADAMA's free cash flow amounted to 25% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

但我們最後的考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司不能用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要現金。因此,我們總是檢查多少EBIt被轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,ADAMA的自由現金流相當於其EBIt的25%,低於我們的預期。這種較弱的現金轉換使處理債務更加困難。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, ADAMA's EBIT growth rate left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. And furthermore, its net debt to EBITDA also fails to instill confidence. We think the chances that ADAMA has too much debt a very significant. To us, that makes the stock rather risky, like walking through a dog park with your eyes closed. But some investors may feel differently. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - ADAMA has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

表面上看,ADAMA的EBIT增長率讓我們對該股感到猶豫,其總負債水平也不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚空無一人的餐廳更吸引人。並且,其淨債務與EBITDA的比率也未能帶來信心。我們認爲ADAMA存在過多債務的可能性非常大。對我們來說,這使得股票變得相當風險,就像閉着眼睛在狗公園裏行走一樣。但是一些投資者可能持有不同看法。當您分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。例如 - ADAMA有1個警示信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論