Institutions Profited After Luye Pharma Group Ltd.'s (HKG:2186) Market Cap Rose HK$451m Last Week but Private Companies Profited the Most
Institutions Profited After Luye Pharma Group Ltd.'s (HKG:2186) Market Cap Rose HK$451m Last Week but Private Companies Profited the Most
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Luye Pharma Group by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 57% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- 29% of Luye Pharma Group is held by Institutions
- 股權投資公司對綠葉製藥集團的重要控制權意味着普通公衆有更多的影響力,可以影響管理和治理相關決策
- 前三大股東持有該企業57%的股份。
- 29%的綠葉製藥集團股份由機構持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Luye Pharma Group Ltd. (HKG:2186), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 33% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解真正控制綠葉製藥集團有限公司(HKG:2186)的是誰,重要的是了解業務的所有權結構。在公司中持有最多股份的集團,準確來說大約佔比33%,是私營公司。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Private companies gained the most after market cap touched HK$12b last week, while institutions who own 29% also benefitted.
上週市值觸及120億港元后,私營公司獲得了最大收益,而持有29%股份的機構也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Luye Pharma Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討綠葉製藥集團每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Luye Pharma Group?
機構持股告訴我們關於綠葉製藥集團的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Luye Pharma Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Luye Pharma Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所見,機構投資者在綠葉製藥集團持有相當數量的股份。 這表明受到專業投資者的認可。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人都會一樣。 如果兩家大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。 因此,值得檢查綠葉製藥集團的過去收益軌跡,(以下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Luye Pharma Group is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Luye Pharma Holdings Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 9.3% of the stock.
綠葉製藥集團不是由對沖基金擁有。我們的數據顯示,綠葉製藥控股有限公司是持有33%的股份的最大股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約15%和9.3%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
股東登記簿的更詳細研究表明,三個最大股東擁有該公司57%的股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Luye Pharma Group
綠葉製藥集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. We do not see this low level of ownership often, and it is possible our data is imperfect. But shareholders can click here to check if insiders have been selling stock.
我們的數據無法證實董事會成員是否持有個人股份。我們很少看到這種低水平的持股,我們的數據可能不完全正確。但是股東可以單擊此處查看內部人是否出售了股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Luye Pharma Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在綠葉製藥集團持有22%的股份。雖然這個群體不能必然左右決策,但肯定可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 15%, private equity firms could influence the Luye Pharma Group board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
擁有15%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響綠葉製藥集團董事會。有時,我們會看到股權投資公司長揸,但一般來說,它們的投資期限較短,並且 -- 正如其名稱所示 -- 不會投資太多公共公司。一段時間後,它們可能會尋求出售並將資本重新投資到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 33%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司33%的股份。私有公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人士通過持有私營公司的股份而不是通過個人身份擁有對公共公司的利益。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。