Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Techtronic Industries Company Limited (HKG:669) With 45% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Techtronic Industries Company Limited (HKG:669) With 45% Ownership
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Techtronic Industries' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders own 25% of Techtronic Industries
- 機構持股比例高意味着德信電氣股價對其交易行爲敏感
- 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
- 內部人員擁有德信電氣25%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Techtronic Industries Company Limited (HKG:669) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 45% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
從德信電氣公司有限公司(HKG:669)的股東看,我們可以知道哪個群體最具影響力。持有最大份額的是擁有45%股份的機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下跌風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit HK$206b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 51%.
上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到2060億港元后獲益最大。上週的收益將進一步提高股東的一年回報率,目前爲51%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Techtronic Industries.
下圖顯示,我們將重點關注Techtronic Industries的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Techtronic Industries?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於Techtronic Industries?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Techtronic Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Techtronic Industries' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所見,機構投資者在Techtronic Industries擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好不要過於依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下方的Techtronic Industries盈利歷史。當然,真正重要的是未來。
Techtronic Industries is not owned by hedge funds. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Techtronic Industries' case, its Top Key Executive, Horst Julius Pudwill, is the largest shareholder, holding 20% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
理想建業不是對沖基金所有。因爲行動勝於言辭,當內部持有人擁有公司的重要股份時,我們認爲這是一個好跡象。在理想建業的情況下,其最高主要執行官Horst Julius Pudwill是最大的股東,持有流通股的20%。 作爲背景,第二大股東持有約9.0%的流通股,第三大股東持有2.8%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊上看,13大股東控制了51%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有這一股權的大多數利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Techtronic Industries
理想建業內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Techtronic Industries Company Limited. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$52b stake in this HK$206b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在理工電子有限公司擁有大量持股。看到內部人士在這家市值2060億港元的企業中擁有價值520億港元的股份,這實在是非常有趣。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一同投資。您可能希望查看這份免費圖表,其中顯示了內部人士最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 29% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Techtronic Industries. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有29%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對理工電子產生了一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定的利好,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Techtronic Industries better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮到持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解理工電子,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。