Tansun Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300872) Market Cap Rose CN¥464m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 50% Profited and so Did Insiders
Tansun Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300872) Market Cap Rose CN¥464m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 50% Profited and so Did Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Tansun Technology's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 27% of Tansun Technology is held by insiders
- 天陽科技的重要零售投資者持股表明關鍵決策受到更多公衆股東的影響
- 前25位股東擁有公司的50%股份。
- 天陽科技的27%股份由內部持有
A look at the shareholders of Tansun Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300872) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 50% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看天陽科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300872)的股東可以告訴我們哪一組最強大。持有最大股份的是擁有50%所有權的零售投資者。換句話說,該組最有可能從對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥4.6b last week, while insiders who own 27% also benefitted.
上週市值達到46億元后,零售投資者獲利最多,擁有27%的內部股東也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Tansun Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解天陽科技的每種所有者類型,從下圖開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tansun Technology?
機構投資者持有的天陽科技的股份告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Tansun Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tansun Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所見,機構投資者在天陽科技擁有相當比例的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅憑這一事實就作出判斷,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,存在被認爲是"擁擠交易"的風險。一旦這樣的交易出現問題,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以在下方看到天陽科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加複雜。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Tansun Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jianping Ouyang with 22% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.9% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對於天陽科技,對沖基金並沒有大規模投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是CEO歐陽建平,持有22%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的9.9%和5.0%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Tansun Technology
天陽科技的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Tansun Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.2b stake in this CN¥4.6b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人員在天陽科技股份有限公司擁有大量股份。內部人員在這家市值460億人民幣的企業中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 50% stake in Tansun Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,在天陽科技持有相當大的50%股份,這意味着它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權規模賦予了來自普通公衆的投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以並且可能會影響執行薪酬、股利政策和擬議的業務收購決策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 10%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私營企業持有該公司股份的10%。 單憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得查明是誰擁有那些私營企業。 有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過另一個私營公司持有公共公司股份的利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tansun Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Tansun Technology you should be aware of.
想了解一個公司擁有股份的不同團體總是值得的。但要更好地理解天陽科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。我們就以一個例子爲證:我們已經發現了天陽科技的一個警示信號,你應該注意下這個。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。