IReader Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603533) Adds CN¥685m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 51% Stake in That Gain
IReader Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603533) Adds CN¥685m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 51% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over IReader Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- IReader Technology重要的內部人控制意味着對公司增長利益的關注
- 前三大股東持有該業務的51%。
- 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。
A look at the shareholders of IReader Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603533) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 51% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下掌閱科技股份有限公司(SHSE:603533)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。持有最大股份的是個別內部股東,佔51%股權。換句話說,該群體將從他們投資公司中獲益最多(或虧損最嚴重)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥685m last week.
顯然,在上週公司市值上漲了68500萬人民幣之後,內部人受益最多。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of IReader Technology.
在下圖中,我們放大了掌閱科技的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IReader Technology?
機構交易數據對掌閱科技有何影響?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in IReader Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
機構在掌閱科技中佔有的股份很少。這表明該公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前並不是專業投資者特別青睞的對象。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移改善,我們很可能會在未來看到更多機構買家。當多個機構投資者想要購買股票時,我們經常會看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入軌跡(如下所示)可能是未來增長的一個指標,但並不能保證。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in IReader Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Ling Yun Zhang, with ownership of 23%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 21% and 7.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Xiang Jun Cheng, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
對於掌閱科技,對沖基金並沒有持有太多股份。該公司最大的股東是 Ling Yun Zhang,持有23%的股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通中股份的21%和7.0%。同時擔任首席執行官的第二大股東是 Xiang Jun Cheng。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.
股東登記簿的更詳細研究表明,前三大股東擁有51%的股權,其所有權相當重要。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of IReader Technology
掌閱科技的內部人控制權。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of IReader Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥3.8b stake in this CN¥7.6b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士擁有掌閱科技有限公司超過一半的股份。 這使他們有效地控制着公司。 這意味着內部人士在這家76億人民幣的公司中擁有非常有意義的38億人民幣的股份。 大多數人會認爲這是正面的,顯示了與股東的強大一致性。 您可以單擊此處查看他們是否一直在減少持股。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in IReader Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆,通常是個別投資者,在掌閱科技持有37%的股份。 儘管這個群體不能必然決定事務,但肯定可以對公司的經營方式產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 7.4%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的7.4%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人身份持有某家公共公司的股份,對某家公共公司表現出興趣。雖然很難得出任何籠統的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的一個領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。