share_log

Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688036) Surges 11%; Private Equity Firms Who Own 50% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688036) Surges 11%; Private Equity Firms Who Own 50% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

深圳Tecno控股有限公司(SHSE:688036)漲幅11%;佔有50%股份的私募股權公司與機構一同獲利
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 03:51

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Shenzhen Transsion Holdings' significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 2 shareholders own 56% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Shenzhen Transsion Holdings is 20%
  • 深圳傳音控股的重要股權投資機構持股量表明,關鍵決策受較大規模公衆股東的影響
  • 前兩大股東持有該公司的56%股份。
  • 深圳傳音控股的機構持股比例爲20%

If you want to know who really controls Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688036), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 50% stake, private equity firms possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着深圳傳音控股有限公司(SHSE:688036),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。私募股權投資機構持有50%的股份,是公司中持股最多的團體。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While private equity firms were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 11% price gain, institutions also received a 20% cut.

股權投資公司是上週股價上漲11%後獲益最多的群體,機構也獲得了20%的份額。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen Transsion Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解深圳Tecno控股的每種所有者,先從下面的圖表開始。

big
SHSE:688036 Ownership Breakdown September 27th 2024
SHSE:688036 2024年9月27日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Transsion Holdings?

機構持股告訴我們有關深圳Tecno控股的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Shenzhen Transsion Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shenzhen Transsion Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到深圳Tecno控股確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注過這支股票,他們喜歡它。但就像任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會急劇下跌。因此,值得查看下面的深圳Tecno控股的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SHSE:688036 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 27th 2024
SHSE:6880362024年9月27日的盈利和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen Transsion Holdings. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shenzhen Transsion Investment Co., Ltd. with 50% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.3% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對於深圳市傳音控股而言,對沖基金並沒有意義重大的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是深圳市傳音投資有限公司,持有流通股的50%。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的6.3%和5.5%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Transsion Holdings

深圳市傳音控股的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co., Ltd. in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own CN¥20m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,深圳市Transsion控股有限公司的內部人士以自己的名義擁有不到1%的股份。 但我們注意到,內部人士可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。 由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人士擁有其很小一部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值2千萬人民幣的股份。在這種情況下,看看那些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出股票可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司擁有19%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定大局,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生實際影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 50%, private equity firms could influence the Shenzhen Transsion Holdings board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

持有50%股權的股權投資公司可能會影響深圳傳音控股董事會。一些投資者可能會受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵制定戰略,有助於市場看到公司的價值。另一方面,這些持有者可能會在將其上市後退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 11%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們看到私人公司持有的股份在發行中佔11%。這可能值得更深入的研究。如果相關方,例如內部人員,在其中一個私人公司中擁有利益,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能也對公司產生戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Shenzhen Transsion Holdings .

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。因此,您應該注意我們在深圳傳音控股發現的1個警告標誌。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論