Read This Before Judging The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CHEF) ROE
Read This Before Judging The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CHEF) ROE
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHEF).
許多投資者仍在學習分析股票時可以派上用場的各種指標。本文是爲那些想要了解淨資產收益率 (roe) 的人準備的。爲了使課程更加貼近實際情況,我們將使用roe來更好地了解The Chefs' Warehouse,Inc.(納斯達克:CHEF)。
Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.
股東權益回報率(ROE)是檢驗公司增加其價值和管理投資者資金有效性的測試。簡而言之,ROE顯示每個美元的利潤與其股東的投資有關。
How Is ROE Calculated?
淨資產收益率怎麼計算?
The formula for ROE is:
roe的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Chefs' Warehouse is:
因此,根據上述公式,Chefs' Warehouse的ROE爲:
8.8% = US$41m ÷ US$462m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
8.8% = 4100萬美元 ÷ 46200萬美元(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.09 in profit.
「收益」是過去十二個月稅後收益。一個理解的方式是,在每美元股東的資本中,公司賺了$0.09的利潤。
Does Chefs' Warehouse Have A Good ROE?
廚師們的食品供應商的roe是好的嗎?
One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Chefs' Warehouse has a lower ROE than the average (12%) in the Consumer Retailing industry classification.
判斷一家公司的股東權益回報是否良好的一個簡單方法是將其與同行業的平均水平進行比較。這種方法的侷限性在於,有些公司即使屬於同一行業分類,也可能存在較大差異。如果你查看下面的圖片,你會發現Chefs' Warehouse的roe低於消費零售行業分類的平均水平(12%)。
Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books.
不幸的是,這是次優的。然而,低ROE並不總是不好。如果公司的債務水平適中或較低,則仍有可能通過使用財務槓桿來改善回報。對於具有高債務且ROE低的公司,則完全是另外一回事,是我們書中的高風險投資。
Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE
爲什麼在觀察ROE時你應該考慮債務問題?
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
幾乎所有公司都需要資金來投資業務以增加利潤。投資所需的現金可以來自前年的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。在前兩種情況下,ROE將反映出這種用於投資業務的現金使用。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報,但不會影響總資產淨額。這將使ROE看起來比不使用債務要好。
Combining Chefs' Warehouse's Debt And Its 8.8% Return On Equity
Combining Chefs' Warehouse的債務及其8.8%的資產回報率
Chefs' Warehouse clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.47. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
Chefs' Warehouse顯然利用大量債務來提高回報率,因爲其債務-股本比率爲1.47。即使債務高企,其ROE仍然相當低,這在我們看來並不是一個好的結果。投資者應該仔細考慮,如果一家公司無法輕鬆借款,那麼它可能會表現如何,因爲信貸市場隨時間會發生變化。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
ROE是我們可以比較不同公司業務質量的一種方式。能夠在不太依賴債務的情況下實現高ROE的公司通常是高品質的。如果兩家公司的ROE相同,則通常會更喜歡債務較少的那家公司。
Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
話雖如此,雖然roe是業務質量的有用指標,但您必須考慮一整套因素來確定購買股票的正確價格。考慮到其他因素,例如未來的利潤增長情況和今後需要投入多少投資等等,這些也是很重要的。因此,我認爲值得查看有關公司分析師預測的免費報告。
But note: Chefs' Warehouse may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.
但請注意:Chefs' Warehouse可能不是最佳的股票買入選擇。因此,請查看這份免費的有高ROE和低債務的有趣公司名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。