With 86% Institutional Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 86% Institutional Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Evergy's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 19 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構持有量高意味着西星能源的股價對他們的交易行爲很敏感
- 前19名股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
A look at the shareholders of Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一下西星能源股份有限公司(納斯達克:EVRG)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。我們可以看到,公司中機構擁有絕大多數股份,佔有86%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果行情出現下滑,將損失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Evergy.
讓我們仔細看看股東的不同類型可以告訴我們關於西星能源的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Evergy?
機構持股告訴我們什麼關於Evergy?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Evergy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Evergy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到西星能源確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股份的相當大一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票並且喜歡它。但就像任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多家機構同時改變對某支股票的觀點,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此值得看看西星能源以下的營業收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Evergy. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are State Street Global Advisors, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.2%.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。我們注意到對西星能源的頭寸不像對沖基金那樣有意義。我們的數據顯示,凡普集團是最大的股東,持有13%的股份。第二大和第三大股東分別是道富銀行全球機構和貝萊德公司,他們各自持有7.2%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
觀察股東登記表,我們可以看到51%的所有權由前19位股東控制,這意味着沒有單一的股東掌握了多數股權所有權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Evergy
Evergy的內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Evergy, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$45m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士只擁有西星能源股份的不到1%。由於這是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有很小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值4500萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Evergy. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在西星能源中持有13%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響其政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Evergy (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .
我覺得看看公司的實際持有人非常有趣。但要真正獲得深入見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解西星能源存在的3個警示信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。