With 64% Ownership of the Shares, NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 64% Ownership of the Shares, NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in NewMarket implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在NewMarket的大量持股表明他們對公司的股價具有重大影響力。
- 總共有8個投資者擁有該公司的52%所有權。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 64% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
通過查看NewMarket Corporation (紐交所:NEU) 的股東,我們可以了解哪個群體的力量最強大。持有最大股份的群體是機構,擁有64%的所有權。換句話說,該群體有可能從他們對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of NewMarket.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看newmarket的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NewMarket?
機構持股情況對NewMarket意味着什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that NewMarket does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of NewMarket, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到newmarket確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當大部分。 這表明專業投資者之間的一些可信度。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像其他人一樣。 如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,那麼很可能會看到股價暴跌。 因此,值得檢查newmarket的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. NewMarket is not owned by hedge funds. Bruce Gottwald is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 7.5% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Thomas Gottwald directly holds 3.8% of the total shares outstanding.
由於機構持有超過半數已發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。newmarket不被對沖基金持有。Bruce Gottwald目前是最大的股東,持有12%的未流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約11%和7.5%的股份。此外,該公司的CEO Thomas Gottwald直接持有總流通股份的3.8%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of NewMarket
NewMarket的內部股權持有情況。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in NewMarket Corporation. Insiders own US$1.2b worth of shares in the US$5.3b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,內部持有NewMarket Corporation的股份仍然很大。內部人士在這家價值53億美元的公司中擁有價值12億美元的股份。這是相當有意義的。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏檢查一下,看看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NewMarket. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有12%股權的普通公衆,主要由個體投資者組成,在NewMarket擁有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可觀,但如果決定不與其他大股東保持一致,可能還不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with NewMarket .
儘管考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該注意我們在newmarket發現的2個警告信號。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。