Institutional Owners May Ignore Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's (NASDAQ:SBCF) Recent US$94m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's (NASDAQ:SBCF) Recent US$94m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在佛羅里達海岸銀行公司的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價具有重大影響力
- 共有10位投資者持有該公司的大部分股份,佔有52%的所有權。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (NASDAQ:SBCF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 84% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位海岸銀行公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SBCF)的投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構佔據了該公司84%的所有權。換句話說,該群體將從對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$94m last week. However, the 23% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
上週道富銀行的市值下降了9400萬美元,機構投資者遭受了最大損失。然而,股東們獲得了23%的一年回報,可能已經緩解了打擊。但他們可能會對未來的損失感到擔憂。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點放在佛羅里達州海岸銀行公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida?
機構持股告訴我們海岸銀行公司的一些情況?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到海岸銀行公司確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的一大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但光憑這個事實是不夠的,因爲機構有時會做出不好的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們會參與「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會爭相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險會更高。您可以在下面查看海岸銀行公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更加複雜的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.4% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.0% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。佛羅里達西海岸銀行股份有限公司並不被對沖基金持有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是添富基金集團有限公司,持有14%的股份。第二大股東是黑石集團,持有7.4%的普通股,而道富全球貨幣投資公司持有該公司5.0%的股份。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
佛羅里達西海岸銀行股份有限公司內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$34m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會感興趣地知道,Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida的內部持有股份。 內部人士擁有價值3400萬美元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。如果您想了解內部人員的利益保持問題,可以 點擊這裏 查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有公司的14%股份,因此在公司政策不與大股東同步時,這個股份的大小雖然相當可觀,但可能不足以改變整個公司的決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,佛羅里達海岸銀行公司在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警告信號,您應該知道...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。