Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300602) Adds CN¥957m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 55% Stake in That Gain
Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300602) Adds CN¥957m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 55% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 15% of Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology is held by Institutions
- 深圳市富瑞德科技的重要內部所有權表明公司擴張中存在內在利益
- 共有2位投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
- 深圳市富瑞德科技15%的股份由機構持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300602), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解真正掌控深圳市富瑞德科技的人,重要的是理解該公司的所有權結構。持有最大股份的群體是個人內部人員,擁有55%的所有權。換句話說,該群體將從他們投資公司中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥9.0b market cap following a 12% gain in the stock.
作爲結果,在上週,隨着股價上漲12%,公司市值達到了90億人民幣,內部人員成績最高。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對深圳FRD科技有什麼信息可以告訴我們。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology?
機構持有情況對深圳FRD科技有何啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,深圳FRD科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的一部分股票。 這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。 如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價急速下跌。因此,值得查看一下深圳FRD科技的歷史收入數據。當然,未來才是最重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology. Fei Ma is currently the company's largest shareholder with 48% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.8% and 2.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Jun Ma, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
我們注意到,對於深圳富仁達科技,並沒有任何對其有意義的對沖基金投資。股東股份中,股東Fei Ma目前擁有48%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的2.8%和2.5%。第三大股東Jun Ma,也恰好擔任董事會成員。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology
深圳富仁達科技的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥4.9b stake in this CN¥9.0b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.
我們的信息顯示,內部人擁有深圳市富銳達科技有限公司超過一半的股份。這使他們有效控制了公司。這意味着內部人在這家價值90億元人民幣的公司中持有着價值49億元人民幣的股份,這種投資水平相當可觀。很高興看到這種投資水平。您可以在這裏查看內部人是否有出售他們的任何股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
看起來私人公司擁有福建啓始集團有限責任公司44%的股權。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人身份擁有上市公司的利益。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 3.1%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私人公司持有已發行股份的3.1%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得進一步了解誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過獨立的私人公司對公共公司的股份感興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。