Private Companies Who Hold 34% of Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688391) Gained 24%, Insiders Profited as Well
Private Companies Who Hold 34% of Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688391) Gained 24%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 5 shareholders own 55% of the company
- Insider ownership in Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) is 27%
- 私營公司對上海高投科技有着重要控制權,這意味着普通公衆對管理和治理相關決策有更大影響力
- 前5大股東擁有公司的55%股份。
- 上海高投科技的內部持股比例爲27%
If you want to know who really controls Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688391), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 34% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制着上海高投科技有限公司(SHSE:688391),那麼您將需要查看其股東名冊的構成。持有最大股份的是私營公司,持股比例爲34%。換句話說,該組織將最受益(或最受損)於他們對公司的投資。
Private companies gained the most after market cap touched CN¥3.6b last week, while insiders who own 27% also benefitted.
上週市值觸及36億元后,私營企業獲利最多,而持有27%股份的內部人士也受益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai).
讓我們更仔細地看看,不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Hi-Trend Technology(上海)的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai)?
機構持股告訴我們有關Hi-Trend Technology(上海)的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Hi-Trend Technology(上海)已經有機構進入股東註冊表。實際上,他們在公司擁有可觀的持股。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會做一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Hi-Trend Technology(上海)以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai). Hi -Trend Technology (HK) Co., is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Yuan Liang Shang and Ching-Yi Huang, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 11%. Additionally, the company's CEO Wenchang Zheng directly holds 1.5% of the total shares outstanding.
對Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai)的對沖基金沒有太多股份。 Hi -Trend Technology (HK) Co.目前是最大的股東,持有17%的股份。 第二和第三大股東分別是Yuan Liang Shang和Ching-Yi Huang,名下持有11%的股份。此外,公司的CEO Wenchang Zheng直接持有總流通股份的1.5%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
普通公衆持有北方銅業的23%股份。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的命運,但它肯定會對公司運營方式產生真正的影響。
Insider Ownership Of Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai)
Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai)的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥972m worth of shares in the CN¥3.6b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來內部人士擁有上海富趨科技有限公司(Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.)相當大比例的股份。 內部人士在這家市值36億人民幣的公司中擁有價值97200萬人民幣的股份。 我們可以說這表明與股東保持一致,但值得注意的是公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能創辦了業務。 您可以 單擊此處 查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai). While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有24%所有權的普通公衆,主要包括個人投資者,對上海富趨科技有限公司(Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai))有一定程度的影響力。 儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響朝他們有利的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 34%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到私人企業擁有已發行股份的34%。 私人企業可能是關聯方。 有時,內部人員通過控股私有公司而對一家上市公司產生利益,而不是以個人身份控股。 雖然很難得出任何籠統的結論,但值得注意的是進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解科技公司嗨趨(上海),我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,根據我們的投資分析,嗨趨(上海)展示出 2 個警示信號,你應該知道...
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。