share_log

With 85% Institutional Ownership, Cadence Bank (NYSE:CADE) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 85% Institutional Ownership, Cadence Bank (NYSE:CADE) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

凱迪銀行(紐交所:CADE)擁有85%的機構持股,是大佬們鍾愛的選擇
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 01:01

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Cadence Bank's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 由於機構在股票中持有大量股份,Cadence銀行的股價可能容易受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前8大股東持有該公司53%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cadence Bank (NYSE:CADE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要真正了解Cadence Bank(紐交所:CADE)的實際控制人,了解企業的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司85%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cadence Bank, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Cadence銀行每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:CADE Ownership Breakdown September 30th 2024
紐交所:CADE股權分佈2024年9月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cadence Bank?

機構所有權對Cadence銀行意味着什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Cadence Bank already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cadence Bank, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Cadence銀行已經有機構持股。確實,它們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票,而且他們喜歡。但就像其他人一樣,他們可能也會出錯。如果兩大機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看Cadence銀行以往的收益軌跡(下圖)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:CADE Earnings and Revenue Growth September 30th 2024
紐交所:CADE2024年9月30日的收益和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cadence Bank. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.7% and 8.9% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數已發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對於凱登斯銀行,對沖基金並沒有具有重大的投資。公司最大的股東是先鋒集團,擁有11%的股權。相比之下,第二和第三大股東各持有大約9.7%和8.9%的股票。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Cadence Bank

我們可以看到內部股東持有Cadence銀行的股票。內部股東持有價值爲6700萬美元的股份。大多數人會將此視爲真正的正面因素。大多數人會說這表明股東和董事會彼此利益一致。不過,也許值得檢查的是這些內部人員是否一直在拋售股票。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Cadence Bank. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$77m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到,內部持有Cadence Bank的股份。這是一家相當大的企業,因此看到一些可能有意義的一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約7700萬美元的股份(按現價計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間存在利益一致。不過,還是值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Cadence Bank has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,風險 - 我們認爲凱登斯銀行有3個警示信號,我們認爲您應該意識到。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論