share_log

Mabpharm Limited (HKG:2181) Adds HK$392m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 50% Stake in That Gain

Mabpharm Limited (HKG:2181) Adds HK$392m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 50% Stake in That Gain

Mabpharm Limited(HKG:2181)市值增加39200萬港幣,並且內部人士持有該增值的50%。
Simply Wall St ·  09/30 18:46

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Mabpharm's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 2 shareholders own 68% of the company
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 馬博藥業的重要內部股東擁有對公司擴張的固有利益
  • 前兩大股東擁有公司68%的股份
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

Every investor in Mabpharm Limited (HKG:2181) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

香港2181股份有限公司中的每位投資者都應該注意公司最具影響力的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說約佔50%,是個人內部人士。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 31% gain.

因此,內部人員成爲上週31%增長中最大的受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Mabpharm, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Mabpharm每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SEHK:2181 Ownership Breakdown September 30th 2024
SEHK:2181所有權分析2024年9月30日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mabpharm?

機構缺席對Mabpharm有何啓示?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Mabpharm, for yourself, below.

爲什麼沒有機構持有公司股份可能有多種原因。通常,規模較小,新上市的公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理無法在公司中建立有意義的持倉。基金經理也可能不持有該股票,因爲他們對公司表現不太確信。機構投資者可能認爲公司的歷史增長並不令人印象深刻,或者可能存在其他因素。您可以在下面看到Mabpharm的歷史營業收入表現。

big
SEHK:2181 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 30th 2024
SEHK:2181於2024年9月30日的收益和營業收入增長

Mabpharm is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Jianjun Guo is the largest shareholder with 50% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 18% and 5.2% of the stock.

Mabpharm不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,郭建軍是最大的股東,持有50%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約18%和5.2%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

普通公衆持有北方銅業的23%股份。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的命運,但它肯定會對公司運營方式產生真正的影響。

Insider Ownership Of Mabpharm

Mabpharm的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Mabpharm Limited. Insiders own HK$824m worth of shares in the HK$1.6b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有Mabpharm有限公司相當比例的股份。 內部人士在這家16億港元的公司中擁有82400萬港元的股份。 我們會說這表明與股東利益保持一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是創立業務的人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Mabpharm. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在Mabpharm持有23%的股份。 雖然這個群體不能一言九鼎,但他們確實可以對公司的經營產生實際影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 23%, private equity firms could influence the Mabpharm board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

擁有23%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響Mabpharm董事會。有時我們會看到股權投資公司長揸股份,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,正如名稱所示,他們不太投資於公共公司。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮賣出股份並將資本重新配置到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 4.0%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們發現私有公司擁有發行股票的4.0%。這可能值得深入研究。如果關聯方(例如內部人士)對其中一傢俬有公司有利益,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私有公司可能對公司具有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Mabpharm better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Mabpharm , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

總是值得考慮公司的股東群體。但要更好地理解Mabpharm,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮投資風險始終存在。我們已經發現了一個Mabpharm的警告信號,了解這些信號應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論