Public Companies in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited (HKG:337) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 152% Last Week
Public Companies in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited (HKG:337) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 152% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- Greenland Holdings Corporation Limited owns 60% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 公共公司在綠地香港控股中擁有相當大的所有權,這表明它們在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權
- 綠地控股有限公司擁有該公司60%的股份
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited (HKG:337), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that public companies own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制綠地香港控股有限公司(HKG:337),那麼您將需要查看其股權登記簿的構成。 我們可以看到,公共公司擁有該公司60%的所有權。 換句話說,該集團將從對該公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
As a result, public companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$803m market cap following a 152% gain in the stock.
因此,公共公司上週取得了最高分,該公司股價上漲152%,市值達到了HK$80300萬。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Greenland Hong Kong Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究綠地香港控股的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Greenland Hong Kong Holdings?
機構持股告訴我們有關綠地香港控股的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Less than 5% of Greenland Hong Kong Holdings is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
綠地香港控股不到5%的股份由機構投資者持有。這表明一些基金已經注意到了該公司,但很多基金尚未購買其股票。如果公司正在增長收入,這可能表明它剛開始引起這些資金雄厚的投資者的關注。如果多個機構投資者同時試圖進入股市,那麼股價可能會大幅上漲。因此,請查看下面的歷史收入軌跡,但請記住最重要的是未來。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is Greenland Holdings Corporation Limited, with ownership of 60%. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. With 6.9% and 3.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Weixian Wang and HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited are the second and third largest shareholders. Weixian Wang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.
對綠地香港控股的持倉基金不多。該公司最大的股東是綠地控股有限公司,持股60%。這基本上意味着他們有廣泛的影響力,如果不是直接控制,也至少可以影響公司的未來。分別持有6.9%和3.3%的股份,瑋賢汪和匯豐環球資產管理(英國)有限公司是第二和第三大股東。瑋賢汪是第二大股東,同時也是高級主管。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究機構持股是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的一種好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現相同的目標。我們目前沒有注意到該股票的任何分析師報告,因此該公司不大可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Greenland Hong Kong Holdings
綠地香港控股的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited. As individuals, the insiders collectively own HK$55m worth of the HK$803m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們可以報告,內部持有者確實擁有綠地香港控股有限公司的股份。作爲個人,內部持有者共同擁有價值5500萬港元的公司總價值80300萬港元。看到內部持有者有一定的投資是好事,但我們通常希望看到更高的內部持股。也許值得檢查這些內部持有者是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Greenland Hong Kong Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
憑藉30%的所有權,普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在綠地香港控股有一定的影響力。雖然這個所有權比例可能不足以左右有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 60% of the Greenland Hong Kong Holdings shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有綠地香港控股發行股份的60%。這可能是戰略上的利益,這兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。也許它們已經分拆。這個持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Greenland Hong Kong Holdings you should be aware of, and 3 of them are potentially serious.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們已經發現綠地香港控股存在4個警示信號,您應該注意其中3個可能很嚴重。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。