Returns On Capital Signal Difficult Times Ahead For Zhejiang Yankon Group (SHSE:600261)
Returns On Capital Signal Difficult Times Ahead For Zhejiang Yankon Group (SHSE:600261)
If you're looking at a mature business that's past the growth phase, what are some of the underlying trends that pop up? More often than not, we'll see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining amount of capital employed. This indicates the company is producing less profit from its investments and its total assets are decreasing. So after glancing at the trends within Zhejiang Yankon Group (SHSE:600261), we weren't too hopeful.
如果您正在看一家成熟的業務,已經過了增長階段,有哪些潛在的趨勢會出現?往往會看到資本收益率(ROCE)下降和資本投入量下降。 這表明公司從其投資中獲得的利潤較少,其總資產正在減少。 因此,在觀察浙江陽光照明集團(SHSE:600261)內部趨勢後,我們並不太樂觀。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Zhejiang Yankon Group:
如果您以前沒有接觸過ROCE,它衡量公司從業務中使用的資本獲得的「回報」(稅前利潤)。 分析師使用這個公式來計算浙江陽光照明集團的ROCE:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.059 = CN¥216m ÷ (CN¥5.1b - CN¥1.5b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.059 = 2.16億元人民幣 ÷ (510億元人民幣 - 15億人民幣)(截至2024年6月的最近十二個月)。
Thus, Zhejiang Yankon Group has an ROCE of 5.9%. On its own that's a low return on capital but it's in line with the industry's average returns of 5.9%.
因此,浙江陽光照明集團的ROCE爲5.9%。 單獨看來,這是一個較低的資本回報率,但與行業平均回報率5.9%相符。
Historical performance is a great place to start when researching a stock so above you can see the gauge for Zhejiang Yankon Group's ROCE against it's prior returns. If you're interested in investigating Zhejiang Yankon Group's past further, check out this free graph covering Zhejiang Yankon Group's past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
歷史表現是研究股票的好起點,您可以在上方看到浙江陽光的ROCE與之前回報的評估。如果您有興趣進一步調查浙江陽光的過去,請查看這個免費圖表,涵蓋浙江陽光過去的收入、營業收入和現金流。
So How Is Zhejiang Yankon Group's ROCE Trending?
那麼浙江陽光的ROCE走勢如何?
We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at Zhejiang Yankon Group. To be more specific, the ROCE was 13% five years ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. Meanwhile, capital employed in the business has stayed roughly the flat over the period. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect Zhejiang Yankon Group to turn into a multi-bagger.
我們對浙江陽光資本回報率的趨勢有些擔憂。更具體地說,五年前的ROCE爲13%,但自那時以來明顯下降。與此同時,業務中使用的資本在此期間基本保持不變。展現這些特徵的公司往往不會萎縮,但可能已經成熟,並面臨來自競爭的利潤壓力。如果這些趨勢持續下去,我們不會指望浙江陽光成爲多倍賺家。
In Conclusion...
最後,同等資本下回報率較低的趨勢通常不是我們關注創業板股票的最佳信號。由於這些發展進行良好,因此投資者不太可能表現友好。自五年前以來,該股下跌了32%。除非這些指標朝着更積極的軌跡轉變,否則我們將繼續尋找其他股票。
In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 10% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere.
最終,資本相同的較低迴報趨勢通常不是我們正在研究的成長股的指標。因此,不足爲奇的是,股票在過去五年下跌了10%,所以投資者似乎已經意識到這些變化。在這些領域具有不佳潛在趨勢的情況下,我們會考慮尋找其他機會。
Zhejiang Yankon Group does come with some risks though, we found 4 warning signs in our investment analysis, and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...
儘管浙江陽光存在一些風險,但我們在投資分析中發現了4個警示信號,其中1個讓我們有些不舒服...
While Zhejiang Yankon Group isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
雖然浙江陽光的回報率並非最高,請查看這份免費公司列表,這些公司在資產負債表上獲得高回報率且資產穩健。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。