share_log

Private Companies in Luolai Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002293) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 21% Last Week

Private Companies in Luolai Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002293) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 21% Last Week

羅萊生活科技股份有限公司(SZSE:002293)的私人公司是其最大的賭徒,他們的押注在上週股價上漲21%時得到了回報
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 23:09

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Luolai Lifestyle Technology's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 5 shareholders own 53% of the company
  • Insiders own 16% of Luolai Lifestyle Technology
  • 羅萊生活科技的大量私人公司所有權表明,重要決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
  • 前5大股東擁有公司53%的股份。
  • 內部人員擁有羅萊生活科技16%的股份

A look at the shareholders of Luolai Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002293) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 40% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下羅萊生活科技股份有限公司(SZSE:002293)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最爲強大。持有最大股份的群體是擁有40%所有權的私人公司。換句話說,該群體將從對公司的投資中獲得或損失最多。

As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 21% gain.

結果,上週的21%漲幅使私營公司成爲最大的受益者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Luolai Lifestyle Technology.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了羅萊生活科技的不同所有權群體。

big
SZSE:002293 Ownership Breakdown October 2nd 2024
SZSE:002293擁有比例於2024年10月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Luolai Lifestyle Technology?

機構持股告訴我們有關羅萊生活科技的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Luolai Lifestyle Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Luolai Lifestyle Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到羅萊生活科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們陷入'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易失敗時,多個方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到羅萊生活科技的歷史盈利和營業收入,但記住故事總是更多。

big
SZSE:002293 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 2nd 2024
深證002293 2024年10月2日營收和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Luolai Lifestyle Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Weijia International Enterprise Co., Ltd., with ownership of 17%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.3% by the third-largest shareholder. Weicheng Xue, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

對羅萊生活科技股票,對沖基金持股不多。該公司最大股東是威佳國際企業有限公司,持股17%。第二大股東持有約15%的流通股,第三大股東持有9.3%的股權。第三大股東薛偉成還擔任董事會主席。

On looking further, we found that 53% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,思派健康技術的前五大股東持有53%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有重要的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Luolai Lifestyle Technology

羅萊生活科技的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Luolai Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.0b stake in this CN¥6.5b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看起來內部持有羅萊生活科技這家公司的股份比例很大。 內部持有該65億元人民幣的企業10億元人民幣的股份。 我們會說這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是該公司仍然相當小; 一些內部人士可能創立了這家企業。 您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 36% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司36%的股權,因此不能輕易忽視。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在政策決策方面左右,但他們仍然可以對公司的政策做出集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 40%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私營企業持有該公司40%的股份。這可能值得更深入的了解。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一傢俬營企業中有利益,那就應該在年報中披露。私有公司可能還對該公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Luolai Lifestyle Technology that you should be aware of.

我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確認了羅萊生活存在1個警示信號,這是您應該注意的。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論