Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co., Ltd's (SZSE:002273) Market Cap Touched CN¥26b Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 54% as Well as Institutions
Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co., Ltd's (SZSE:002273) Market Cap Touched CN¥26b Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 54% as Well as Institutions
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Zhejiang Crystal-Optech by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 38% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Zhejiang Crystal-Optech is 24%
- 零售投資者對浙江水晶光電的重要控制權意味着普通公衆對管理和治理決策有更大的影響力
- 總共有25個投資者持有該公司的大部分股權,擁有38%的所有權。
- 浙江水晶光電的機構持股比例爲24%
If you want to know who really controls Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co., Ltd (SZSE:002273), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制浙江水晶光電股份有限公司(SZSE:002273),那麼您必須查看其股東登記冊的構成。零售投資者佔據了公司54%的股份,換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或損失最多)的利益。
Following a 15% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 24% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上週股價上漲15%之後,零售投資者獲利最多,但擁有24%股份的機構也有望從上漲中獲利。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zhejiang Crystal-Optech.
下面的圖表詳細介紹了浙江水晶光電的不同所有權組合。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Crystal-Optech?
機構所有權告訴我們有關浙江水晶光電的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Zhejiang Crystal-Optech. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zhejiang Crystal-Optech's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在浙江水晶光電投資了相當數量的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴於這一事實,因爲機構有時也做出糟糕的投資,就像所有人一樣。當多個機構擁有某隻股票時,總存在它們出現'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以查看浙江水晶光電的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事遠不止這些。
Zhejiang Crystal-Optech is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Xingxing Group Co.,Ltd with 8.9% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.2% by the third-largest shareholder.
水晶光電並不是由對沖基金所擁有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是星星集團有限公司,持有8.9%的股份。爲了解背景,第二大股東持有約5.3%的股份,其次是第三大股東持有2.2%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Crystal-Optech
廣大公衆,主要包括個人投資者,共同持有浙江水晶光電的58%股份。在這種情況下,零售投資者可以集體對影響股東回報的決策發揮作用,如分紅政策和董事會任命。他們還可以行使投票權對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併進行投票。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co., Ltd. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around CN¥1.1b worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告,內部人士確實在水晶光電股份有限公司擁有股份。 這是一家規模相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能具有重要意義的一致性通常是積極的。 在這種情況下,他們持有大約11億人民幣的股份(以當前價格計算)。 大多數人會說,這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。 儘管如此,查看一下這些內部人士是否一直在賣出股份可能值得一試。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 54% of Zhejiang Crystal-Optech. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在浙江水晶光電擁有54%的股份。 這種所有權規模賦予了普通公衆的投資者一定的集體力量。 他們可以並且很可能會影響有關執行薪酬、股利政策和擬議業務併購的決定。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 5.3%, private equity firms could influence the Zhejiang Crystal-Optech board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
擁有5.3%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響浙江水晶光電董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲股權投資有時是激進的,會讓管理層承擔責任。但另一些時候,股權投資則賣掉股份,把公司上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 12%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有發行股份的12%。如果相關方(例如內部人)對其中一傢俬營公司具有利益,則應在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能也對該公司具有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Zhejiang Crystal-Optech you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。考慮風險,例如。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了浙江水晶光電的2個警告信號,您應該了解。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。