Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002381) Market Cap Rose CN¥412m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 48% Profited and so Did Insiders
Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002381) Market Cap Rose CN¥412m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 48% Profited and so Did Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 36% of Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber is held by insiders
- 雙箭股份的大量零售投資者持股表明關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
- 前18大股東擁有該公司50%的所有權。
- 36%的雙箭股份由內部持有
If you want to know who really controls Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002381), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制着雙箭股份股份有限公司(SZSE:002381),那麼您將需要查看其股權註冊情況。擁有最大份額的是擁有48%所有權的零售投資者群體。換句話說,該群體將從對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或蒙受最大損失)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 16% price gain, insiders also received a 36% cut.
儘管零售投資者是上週股價上漲16%後收益最多的群體,內部人員也獲得了36%的份額。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了對浙江雙箭橡膠的不同所有權群體的關注。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber?
機構持股告訴我們有關浙江雙箭橡膠的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到浙江雙箭橡膠確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司的股票的一大部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。如果有兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售某隻股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此值得查看浙江雙箭橡膠的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。
Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber is not owned by hedge funds. Gengliang Shen is currently the company's largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 5.1% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Huimin Shen is the owner of 4.0% of the company's shares.
浙江雙箭橡膠不是由對沖基金所持有。申耿亮目前是公司最大的股東,持有21%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.5%和5.1%的股份。此外,CEO沈匯民擁有公司4.0%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 18 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東名冊來看,我們可以看到18位最高股東控制了50%的股權,這意味着沒有單個股東掌控股權的多數利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber
浙江雙箭橡膠的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.1b stake in this CN¥3.0b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人士在浙江雙箭橡膠股份有限公司持有大量股份。內部人士在這家30億元人民幣的公司中持有11億元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊這裏查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 48% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有48%股權,主要由個人投資者組成的大衆,對浙江雙箭橡膠有一定程度的影響力。雖然這個團體可能無法直接決定事務,但卻可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.4%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司8.4%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得進一步研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過獨立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們發現雙箭股份存在2個警示信號,您應該注意其中一個有點令人擔憂。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。