Joy Kie Corporation Limited's (SZSE:300994) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Zheng Li Must Be Pleased With the Recent 24% Gain
Joy Kie Corporation Limited's (SZSE:300994) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Zheng Li Must Be Pleased With the Recent 24% Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Joy Kie's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 內部人員似乎對喬伊凱的增長有着極大的利益,可以從他們龐大的所有權中看出
- 總共有2個投資者掌握了該公司52%的所有權。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Joy Kie Corporation Limited (SZSE:300994), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 67% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着Joy Kie Corporation Limited (SZSE:300994)的情況,很重要的一點是了解公司的所有權結構。擁有公司股份最多的集團,大約佔公司股份的67%,是個人內部人員。換句話說,這個集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)利益。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥510m last week.
顯然,上週公司市值上漲了51000萬元後,內部人受益最多。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Joy Kie.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Joy Kie的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Joy Kie?
機構持股告訴我們有關Joy Kie的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Joy Kie. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Joy Kie's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Joy Kie中持有相當數量的股份。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票並且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能出錯。 當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在他們參與『擁擠式交易』的風險。 當這樣一種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。 在沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以看到Joy Kie的歷史收益和營業收入,但不要忘記故事中總會有更多內容。
Joy Kie is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Zheng Li with 33% of shares outstanding. Zhiyong Lu is the second largest shareholder owning 18% of common stock, and Yuguang Li holds about 15% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second and third-largest shareholders also happen to be the Senior Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. This once again signifies considerable insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
Joy Kie不屬於對沖基金所有。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是CEO鄭立擁有33%的流通股。盧志勇是第二大股東,擁有18%的普通股,李玉光持有公司股份約15%。有趣的是,第二和第三大股東也恰好是高級主管和董事會成員,這再次表明公司的頂級股東中存在相當大的內部持股。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Joy Kie
Joy Kie的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Joy Kie Corporation Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own CN¥1.8b worth of shares in the CN¥2.7b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士擁有九佳有限公司超過一半的股權。 這讓他們有效地控制了公司。 這意味着他們在總市值27億人民幣的公司中擁有18億人民幣的股份。 這是相當有意義的。 大多數人會樂於看到董事會與他們一起投資。 您可能希望免費發現他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Joy Kie. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通過擁有23%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的普通公衆對九佳有一定程度的影響力。 儘管這種所有權規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 4.0%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的4.0%。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員可能通過持有私人公司股份而對公共公司產生興趣,而非以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的一個方向。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Joy Kie has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需考慮其他信息。舉個例子,承擔風險 - Joy Kie有1個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。