Junhe Pumps Holding Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:603617) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 19% Last Week
Junhe Pumps Holding Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:603617) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 19% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 5 shareholders own 52% of the company
- 16% of Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd is held by insiders
- 君禾泵業有限公司的重要私人公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆股東的影響
- 前五大股東持有該公司52%的股份。
- 君禾泵業持有的16%股權由內部持有人持有
If you want to know who really controls Junhe Pumps Holding Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603617), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 40% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着君禾泵業股份有限公司(SHSE:603617),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。私人公司持有公司40%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥2.3b market cap following a 19% gain in the stock.
作爲結果,私營公司上週以股價上漲19%至23億人民幣市值表現最好。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注君禾股份有限公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd?
機構持股告訴我們有關君禾股份有限公司的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
君禾股份有限公司的股份註冊中已經有機構名義。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某支股票,這會導致股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下君禾股份有限公司的過去收入軌跡(如下)。當然,也請記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Ningbo Junhe Holding Group Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.2% and 4.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Jun Bo Zhang directly holds 3.0% of the total shares outstanding.
君禾泵業股份有限公司並非由對沖基金持有。 寧波君禾控股集團有限公司目前是公司最大的股東,持有33%的流通股。 與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的7.2%和4.8%。此外,公司的CEO張俊波直接持有流通股總數的3.0%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd
君禾泵業股份有限公司的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Junhe Pumps Holding Co.,Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.3b, and insiders have CN¥371m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部持有君禾股份有限公司的股份比例很高。其市值僅爲23億人民幣,內部人士名下擁有價值37100萬人民幣的股份。看到內部人士如此投資業務是好事。也許值得檢查這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
似乎內部人員佔有鄭州天邁科技有限公司的相當比例股權。內部人員在這家20億元的公司中持有7170萬人民幣的股權。看到內部人員如此投入業務是非常好的,這值得檢查這些內部人員最近是否一直在購買股票。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 40%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私營公司佔已發行股票的40%。僅從這一事實就很難得出任何結論,因此值得進一步了解是誰擁有這些私營公司。有時候內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有公衆公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Junhe Pumps HoldingLtd (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解君禾股份,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了君禾股份的3個警示信號(1個不容忽視!),在投資這裏之前您應該注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。