share_log

With 66% Ownership of the Shares, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (NASDAQ:CRSP) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 66% Ownership of the Shares, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (NASDAQ:CRSP) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有66%股權的CRISPR Therapeutics AG (納斯達克:CRSP) 被機構投資者嚴重主導
Simply Wall St ·  06:01

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in CRISPR Therapeutics implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 23 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構對CRISPR Therapeutics的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前23名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of CRISPR Therapeutics AG (NASDAQ:CRSP), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 66% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了CRISPR Therapeutics AG(納斯達克股票代碼:CRSP),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲66%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CRISPR Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究CRISPR Therapeutics的每種所有者。

big
NasdaqGM:CRSP Ownership Breakdown October 2nd 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:CRSP 所有權明細 2024 年 10 月 2 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CRISPR Therapeutics?

關於CRISPR療法,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CRISPR Therapeutics. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CRISPR Therapeutics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有CRISPR Therapeutics的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到CRISPR Therapeutics的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGM:CRSP Earnings and Revenue Growth October 2nd 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:2024年10月2日CRSP收益和收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. CRISPR Therapeutics is not owned by hedge funds. Capital Research and Management Company is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. ARK Investment Management LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 8.8% of common stock, and Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd. holds about 3.6% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。CRISPR Therapeutics不歸對沖基金所有。資本研究與管理公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的9.3%。方舟投資管理有限責任公司是第二大股東,擁有8.8%的普通股,日興資產管理有限公司持有該公司約3.6%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 23 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前23位的合計持有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of CRISPR Therapeutics

CRISPR 療法的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$19m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有CRISPR Therapeutics AG不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1900萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in CRISPR Therapeutics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有CRISPR Therapeutics34%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with CRISPR Therapeutics .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在CRISPR Therapeutics中發現的兩個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論