share_log

While Individual Investors Own 35% of Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd (SGX:S63), Private Equity Firms Are Its Largest Shareholders With 51% Ownership

While Individual Investors Own 35% of Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd (SGX:S63), Private Equity Firms Are Its Largest Shareholders With 51% Ownership

雖然個人投資者擁有新加坡科技工程有限公司(新加坡交易所:S63)35%的股份,但股權投資公司卻是其51%的最大股東。
Simply Wall St ·  10/02 18:55

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Singapore Technologies Engineering by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited owns 51% of the company
  • Institutions own 13% of Singapore Technologies Engineering
  • 私募股權公司對新加坡科技工程公司的重要控制意味着普通公衆在影響管理和治理決策方面具有更大的權力
  • 淡馬錫持有公司51%的股份
  • 機構持有新加坡科技工程公司13%的股份

Every investor in Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd (SGX:S63) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private equity firms with 51% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

新加坡科技工程有限公司(SGX:S63)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。而持有最大股份的群體是擁有51%所有權的私募股權公司。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 35% of the company's stockholders.

另一方面,個人投資者佔公司股東的35%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Singapore Technologies Engineering.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型股東對新加坡科技工程有什麼信息。

big
SGX:S63 Ownership Breakdown October 2nd 2024
新加坡交易所:S63 所有權拆分於2024年10月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Singapore Technologies Engineering?

機構擁有的股權告訴我們什麼關於新加坡科技工程?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Singapore Technologies Engineering already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Singapore Technologies Engineering's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

新加坡科技工程股東名冊上已有機構。確實,他們在公司擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一些可信度。但我們不能僅依賴這一事實,因爲有時機構會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會做一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,他們總是存在「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以查看新加坡科技工程的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。

big
SGX:S63 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 2nd 2024
新加坡交易所:S63 2024年10月2日的收入和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Singapore Technologies Engineering. The company's largest shareholder is Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, with ownership of 51%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 1.9% and 1.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到對沖基金在新加坡航空工程公司沒有實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是淡馬錫持倉(私人)有限公司,持有51%的股份。擁有如此巨大的股份,我們推斷他們對公司未來有重要的控制權。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有該公司已發行股份的1.9%和1.8%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Singapore Technologies Engineering

新加坡航空工程公司的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own S$64m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有新加坡航空工程公司不到1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部持有很小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值6400萬新加坡元的股份。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但也值得注意的是,可能需要檢查這些內部人員是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 35% stake in Singapore Technologies Engineering. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般大衆,通常是個別投資者,持有新加坡航空工程35%的股份。雖然這個群體不能一言九鼎,但他們確實對公司的管理產生實質影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 51%, private equity firms could influence the Singapore Technologies Engineering board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

擁有51%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響新加坡航空工程公司的董事會。有時我們看到股權投資公司會長揸,但總的來說,他們的投資期限較短,並且正如名稱所示,不太投資於公共公司。一段時間後,他們可能會尋求出售並將資金重新投向其他地方。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Singapore Technologies Engineering better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Singapore Technologies Engineering you should be aware of, and 1 of them is concerning.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解新加坡航空航天工程,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以此爲例:我們已經發現新加坡航空航天工程存在 2 個警示信號,您應該注意其中1個是令人擔憂的。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論