share_log

Arta TechFin Corporation Limited's (HKG:279) Market Cap Increased by HK$479m, Insiders Receive a 73% Cut

Arta TechFin Corporation Limited's (HKG:279) Market Cap Increased by HK$479m, Insiders Receive a 73% Cut

裕承科金公司有限公司(HKG:279)的市值增加了47900萬港元,內部人士獲得了73%的分成
Simply Wall St ·  18:11

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Arta TechFin implies vested interests in company growth
  • 73% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Chi-Kong Cheng)
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 對裕承科金存在重要內部控制意味着對公司增長有着利益關係
  • 公司73%的股份由單一股東(鄭志剛)持有
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Arta TechFin Corporation Limited (HKG:279), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 73% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着裕承科金有限公司(HKG:279),那麼您需要看看其股權登記的構成。 持有最大股份的是持股73%的個人內部人士。 也就是說,如果股價上漲,該團體將獲得最大利益(或在股價下跌時損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$938m market cap following a 104% gain in the stock.

因此,內部人士上週得分最高,隨着股票上漲104%,公司市值達到了HK$93800萬。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Arta TechFin.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於裕承科金的什麼。

big
SEHK:279 Ownership Breakdown October 3rd 2024
SEHK:279所有權分佈於2024年10月3日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arta TechFin?

機構持股缺乏給我們關於裕承科金的什麼信息?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們不會看到機構投資者持有非常高風險、交易較少或非常小的公司的股票。雖然有時會看到大公司沒有機構在註冊表上,但這並不是特別普遍的情況。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Arta TechFin might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

有多種解釋爲機構不持有某隻股票。最常見的是公司相對於資產管理規模太小,因此機構不願意仔細關注該公司。基金經理也可能不持有該股票,因爲他們並不確信它會表現良好。裕承科金可能沒有機構所期望的過去表現,或者也許他們只是沒有深入研究該企業。

big
SEHK:279 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 3rd 2024
SEHK:279 營收和收入增長2024年10月3日

Arta TechFin is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Chi-Kong Cheng with 73% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second largest shareholder is Gain Bright Limited holding 5.9%.

裕承科金不受對沖基金持有。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是鄭志剛,持有73%的流通股。這意味着他們對公司未來具有控制權。同時,第二大股東是Gain Bright Limited,持有5.9%。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。分析師觀點也可以達到相同的目的。我們的信息表明,這隻股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,所以它可能不是很出名。

Insider Ownership Of Arta TechFin

裕承科金的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Arta TechFin Corporation Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a HK$687m stake in this HK$938m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據顯示,裕承科金有限公司的大部分股份由內部持有人擁有。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。因此,他們在這家價值9,3800萬港元的公司中持有6,8700萬港元的股份。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看內部持有人最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Arta TechFin. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

佔有21%的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對裕承科金擁有一定影響力。儘管這個群體可能不能直接決定事務,但確實會對公司的運營產生實質影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 5.9%, of the Arta TechFin stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

似乎私人公司擁有裕承科金5.9%的股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部持有人可能通過私人公司持股而非以個人名義對公共公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何明顯結論,但值得注意作爲未來研究的一個方向。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Arta TechFin you should be aware of, and 2 of them shouldn't be ignored.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們發現裕承科金存在3個警示信號,您應該注意,其中有2個不容忽視。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論